The “Public Interest”

No matter which party or politician backs a particular piece of legislation, its advocates nearly always proclaim that it serves the public interest. And opponents are just as quick to claim that the legislation is harmful to the public interest. The Keystone XL pipeline serves as an example.

For years, the pipeline was a controversial issue. Critics claimed that the pipeline did not serve the public interest. Jane Kleeb, president of the Bold Alliance, one of the Keystone XL’s leading opponents, told the Nebraska Public Utility Commision, “We have the evidence on our side that this pipeline does not meet the public interest of Nebraska.” Proponents responded that the pipeline would reduce dependence on oil from the Middle East and create jobs—both of which it argued was in the public interest. Union members favored building the pipeline.

But attorney Brian Jorde said, “The main question is not farmers versus union members. We also support union members and jobs. The threshold question is: Is this project in the public interest of Nebraska? And it’s not.” Which side is correct? Is the pipeline in the public interest or not?

While both sides bickered over what is and isn’t in the public interest, neither bothered to define what constitutes the public interest. And Keystone is hardly the only example. The reason that nobody bothers to define the public interest is quite simple—the term can’t be defined.

The American public consists of more than 330 million people. Some are gay and some are straight. Some are male and some are female. Some are white and some are Hispanic, black, Asian, and other ethnicities or races. Some are Christian, some are Jewish, some are Muslim, and some are atheists. Some like baseball and some like ballet. In short, the American public is not monolithic. It consists of individuals with a wide range of characteristics, values, and interests. To proclaim that a particular policy or program serves the public interest is to ignore this vast diversity of values and interests.

In practice, the public interest means that the interests of some individuals take precedence over the interests of others. Some individuals will be forced to sacrifice for the alleged benefit of others.

It is not surprising then, that groups seek to curry favor with politicians and bureaucrats. Groups seek to influence the policy makers who wield tremendous power over individuals and businesses. Those groups want favorable legislation and regulations, and they are willing to trade political support for those government favors.

Similar Posts

  • Her Children’s Keeper

    In late October, those taking part in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAPs, better known as food stamps, began to panic as the government shutdown threatened their payments. One woman stated on Tik Tok, “It is the taxpayer’s responsibility to take care of my kids. It is the taxpayer’s job to pay for my kids…

  • The Elephant in the Room

    Housing activists frequently proclaim that a household earning the minimum wage cannot afford a two-bedroom apartment. This is the elephant in the room that housing activists refuse to address. As an example, the executive director of the Capital Area Housing Partnership in Michigan writes, The fair market rent for a modest two-bedroom apartment in the…

  • Contradictions or Confusion?

    Last week, Chronicle business columnist Chris Tomlinson wrote about the contradictions in the newspaper business. Interestingly, what he calls contradictions are really an admission of his own confusion about how a free market operates. For example, he writes The industry itself was founded on a contradiction. Historically, publishers focused on selling paper more than news….

  • |

    The Real Tragedy of Bullying

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on October 11, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. An OpEd in Sunday’s Chronicle tells us that we must protect kids from bullying. Citing a growing number of suicides by bullied teenagers, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education, write: The…

  • Challenge the Morality

    Virginia Democrats are backing a bill that would extend taxpayer-paid healthcare to illegal immigrants. Not surprisingly, Republicans are objecting to the bill, but they won’t challenge the morality that underlies it–altruism. One state Senator said, They want to grant illegal immigrants driver’s licenses that are valid for up to eight years. Now, they’re also working…