|

Biden’s Power Grab

Given my vehement opposition to zoning, one might think that I would be cheering a plan from the Biden Administration aimed at reducing single-family zoning. But there is little reason to cheer this plan. Biden has not suddenly become an advocate of property rights.

The stated goal of Biden’s plan is to allow greater housing density in an effort to address the affordable housing crisis. Single-family zoning mandates that a parcel of land can only hold a single-family house. It is common for more than 60 percent of the land zoned for residential has a single-family designation. This reduces the supply of housing, and it also increases the cost of the available land. Eliminating single-family zoning would ostensibly give developers the freedom to build townhouses, duplexes, and other multi-family housing where a single-family house once stood. However, freedom for housing producers isn’t the goal, and it likely won’t be the result.

Consider: If eliminating single-family zoning is such a good idea—and it is—then why must Biden bribe cities to take action? Why not make the case for repealing single-family zoning and encourage cities to act accordingly? The answer is: this is a power grab.

The plan is still being developed, so details are lacking. But if Washington is providing grants and tax incentives, then we can be certain that strings will be attached. And the puppet masters in Washington will be manipulating and controlling the actions of local government officials. The result will be greater federal control over housing.

If Biden truly wants to solve the affordable housing crisis, he can do it without spending hundreds of billions of dollars. All he has to do is pass legislation that makes zoning (and all other land-use regulations) illegal in the United States. The Biden Administration is proposing a piecemeal approach and many cities may not participate. A national repeal of zoning would free housing producers everywhere.

Biden won’t choose this approach because he isn’t concerned with freeing the housing producers. He is concerned with consolidating more power in Washington. And that is what his plan will accomplish.

Similar Posts

  • Making the Problem Worse

    Housing activists frequently decry the growing corporate presence in rental housing. The activists fail to realize that the policies they advocate are a significant reason why. Housing activists call for rent control, “right to counsel,” eviction moratoriums, “ban the box,” and numerous other restrictions and mandates that shackle landlords. Activists and tenants are making the…

  • Friday Roundup 6-18-21

    Last week, the New York Assembly passed a bill that will make it easier for tenants to sure their landlord when certain repairs have not been performed. The bill would allow judges to provide any relief they choose, including a monetary judgment to the tenant. Earlier this year, the state extended its eviction moratorium until…

  • Breaking a Few Eggs

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on December 16, 2008. Comments have not been migrated. I have previously written how the Texas Open Beaches Act may be used to prohibit beach front property owners from rebuilding their homes in the wake of Hurricane Ike. This is bad enough, but California officials are attempting to…

  • A History Lesson

    Many Americans view history as little more than a collection of semi-interesting stories. History, they believe, has little bearing on contemporary life. They believe that that was then, and this is now. Times have changed. Viewed properly, history is an intellectual laboratory. We can trace the intellectual causes and motivations of events, movements, and individuals….