|

Profits are Pro-life

Producers have long been under attack around the world. The pandemic has intensified those attacks. Perhaps the most notable target are housing producers and vaccine producers. We must not, the attackers declare, put profits before people. But the fact is, attacking producers is an attack on human life. Producers have enabled mankind to rise from a world of perpetual scarcity to a world of unimaginable abundance.

These attacks are the embodiment of certain philosophical ideas. Epistemologically (the theory of knowledge), the attacks are a monstrous evasion. Ethically, they are an open call for sacrifice. Politically, they are demand for subservience to the State.

To attack producers, one must evade the very nature of production. The values that sustain human life do not magically appear simply because we want or need them. Values must be produced, and to produce any value, one must think. One must identify what actions are required to bring that value into existence, and then one must take the requisite actions. The attacks on producers are an attack on the mind. They are an attempt render the producer’s judgment irrelevant by forcing him to act contrary to what he deems best.

These attacks are founded on the premise that we have a moral duty to sacrifice for others. We have an obligation to share the values we produce with those who do not or cannot. Values, we are told, should not be produced for our own benefit, but for others. Landlords have an obligation to provide housing to renters. Big Pharma has a duty to share its vaccines with poor countries.

When producers are unwilling to voluntarily sacrifice, the attackers call for the State to intervene and force them. If producers won’t honor their unchosen obligations volitionally, then government should compel them to do so. Landlords should be forced to rent their properties on terms and conditions set by government. Big Pharma should have its intellectual property rights stripped and be required to share its knowledge and technology with others.

Putting people before profits, as the attackers advocate, means sacrificing the individuals and businesses that produce the values we want and need. It means shackling the hands of those who produce housing. It means enslaving the minds of those who produce life-saving medicines. Despite the denunciations of putting profits before people, those who attack the producers want to sacrifice some people for the alleged benefit of other people.

Contrary to the claims of the attackers, there is no conflict between people and profits. Producers earn a profit by creating and trading values with people who want and need those values. Profits are their reward for producing life-sustaining values. Profits are pro-life.

Similar Posts

  • Justice Inc: A Novel has been Published

    Justin Walker and Pratik Shah are the owners of Justice Inc, a business in Houston that provides intellectual bodyguard services. Traditional bodyguards protect others from physical threats. Intellectual bodyguards protect others from intellectual threats–bad ideas. Shortly after the COVID pandemic begins, Justice Inc finds itself embroiled in a battle against government officials in both the…

  • Rebel Against the Tyrants

    For nearly two months, Americans have allowed government to shut down businesses, destroy jobs, and wreck the economy. For nearly two months, Americans have tolerated an unprecedented destruction of values. This isn’t a new occurrence in American history. In the 18th century Great Britain enacted a series of laws that shut down businesses, destroyed jobs…

  • Loneliness and Altruism

    In 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General issued a report titled “Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation.” The report found that nearly half of American adults experience “measurable levels of loneliness.” This topic was discussed at a Jefferson Dinner I recently attended. Being a member of a community of people who share our interests, goals, or…

  • Humility vs. Pride

    In America today, humility is widely regarded as a virtue. In connotation and denotation, humility is viewed as having a low view of one’s importance. In contrast, pride is widely regard as a vice. Indeed, in Christian morality, pride is the worst of sins. But pride means “a becoming or dignified sense of what is…

  • The Fallacy of Conflicting Rights

    A major source of political animosity and controversy today is the belief that the rights of individuals occasionally conflict. The issue then becomes whose “rights” will be protected and whose rights will be thrown under the bus. As an example, last week the Corpus Christi Caller-Times published an editorial supporting restrictions and bans on vaping…

  • The Politics of Water Rates

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on April 26, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. In defending the highest water rate increase in the history of Houston, city officials have regularly made noises about the need to have citizens pay the full cost of delivering clean drinking water. As council member Sue Lovell said:…