Life without a Livelihood

Throughout the coronavirus pandemic, government officials have repeatedly told us that their primary objective is to save lives. And to accomplish that goal, they have forced businesses to close or operate under less than ideal conditions. Not surprisingly, many workers–more than twenty million–have lost their job, their livelihood.

The government’s efforts to save lives has destroyed the ability of many to sustain their lives. The government is forcing individuals to live without the freedom to take the necessary actions to do so.

As I write this on April 16, there have been less than 700,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases in the United States. Since the middle of March, more than 20,000,000 have lost their job, and millions more will likely join the ranks of the unemployed in the coming weeks.

Destroying jobs to save lives is a gross contradiction. Jobs are the means by which individuals sustain their lives. Certainly, some individuals can live off of their savings (if they have adequate savings), but that means depleting funds set aside for their children’s education, retirement, or some other long-term goal.

We will never know how many lives were saved by shutting down the economy. But we can determine how many lives are being severely damaged by the shut down–the government gives us regular updates. We can determine the number being harmed by forcing individuals to live without a livelihood. And that number far exceeds the victims of COVID-19.

Similar Posts

  • When we Disagree

    Rational people do not always agree on the proper course of action. They may not possess the same knowledge of the issue or put more emphasis on some facts. They may have different values or goals. When rational people disagree on the proper course of action, they attempt to persuade one another. They present facts…

  • They Should Do Something

    According to Gallup, America’s trust in the federal government has steadily declined over the past fifty years. In May 1972, 70 percent of Americans had a “great deal” or a “fair amount” of trust that the federal government could successfully deal with domestic problems. In September 2019, that number had dropped to 50 percent. Yet,…

  • |

    Friday Roundup 5-14-21

    One of the latest trends in the “tenants’ rights” movement is to provide free legal representation for tenants facing eviction. Washington state has passed such a law and other states are considering doing so. As with nearly everything associated with “housing justice,” these laws will ultimately create a host of new problems. As one example,…

  • Vaccine Imperialism

    For months, there have been increasing demands for waivers for the intellectual property rights to COVID vaccines. Big Pharma, the argument goes, should share its knowledge and technology with anyone who desires it. To refuse to do so is “vaccine imperialism.” The failure to waive intellectual property rights is being blamed for the low vaccination…