Church and State, Gambling and Vouchers

Gambling and vouchers promise to be two hotly debated topics in the 2023 session of the Texas legislature. Legislators have filed several bills to expand gambling in the state, as well as bills to create a voucher program. Texas Baptists are opposing both efforts. Interestingly, they claim that education vouchers violate religious liberty and the separation of church and state while simultaneously working to impose their religious beliefs on the entire state.

Proponents of vouchers want to give parents more freedom to place their children in private schools, whether secular or religious. However, because the vouchers are funded by tax dollars, opponents argue that “public money” shouldn’t be used to subsidize religious schools. Doing so would ostensibly constitute state support to religion. This is the reason that Baptists oppose school vouchers.

However, vouchers will not benefit a particular religion or sect. They are not government support of religion. They are support for freedom of choice.

Baptists oppose gambling because it violates their religious beliefs, and they want the state to impose those beliefs upon all Texans. Baptists and non-Baptists alike should be prohibited from gambling, regardless of their personal desires and preferences. This is nothing more than the imposition of a particular religious tenet. Such actions violate the separation of church and state.

Fundamentally, the separation of church and state is a protection for intellectual freedom. That separation prohibits government from prescribing or proscribing religious ideas. Morally, individuals should be free to accept and act on whatever religious ideas they choose, so long as they respect the right of others to do the same.

The Baptists don’t want others to be free to act on ideas with which they—the Baptists—disagree. They don’t want others to be free to choose, and this is true in regard to both gambling and vouchers. If an individual chooses to gamble, the Baptists want it to be illegal for him to act on that choice in Texas. If an individual wants to send his child to a non-government school, the Baptists want it to be more difficult to act on that choice.

If we support freedom of choice, then we should legalize both gambling and vouchers. If we support freedom of choice, we must recognize and accept the fact that others may make choices with which we disagree. Baptists do not support freedom of choice. They want their choices imposed on everyone else.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Freedom over Fascism

    When the United States House of Representatives debated the “Parents Bill of Rights Act,” Democrats made a series of strange claims. One of the more curious statements came from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), who declared that she values “freedom over fascism.” It has become fashionable among Leftists to call conservatives fascist. While this is often an…

  • |

    The Real Tragedy of Bullying

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on October 11, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. An OpEd in Sunday’s Chronicle tells us that we must protect kids from bullying. Citing a growing number of suicides by bullied teenagers, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education, write: The…

  • Educational Freedom

    In September, the Heritage Foundation released its Education Freedom Report Card. Florida received the top rating for educational freedom, followed by Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, and South Dakota. The District of Columbia was ranked last for educational freedom, with New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and Massachusetts joining D.C. at the bottom of the rankings. Heritage used…

  • The Altar of Government Schools

    This was originally posted on PoodleRose on August 30, 2013. Comments have not been migrated. Rational parents want what is best for their children. Such parents recognize that their primary responsibility is to raise their children to be independent, rational adults. A significant part of this responsibility is to provide the child with the necessary…