Taking Aim at the Bullet Train

Once again, Texas legislators have filed bills aimed specifically at a single company–Texas Central–in an effort to stop the proposed high-speed railroad between Dallas and Houston. As an example, State Rep. Ben Leman has filed a bill that would require the line to be “compatible with more than one type of train technology.”

These bills are both dangerous and unprincipled.

Leman claims that if the bullet train is built, it should be done “in a way that is transparent and ensures the proper balance between the use of eminent domain and private property rights.” To accomplish this, he proposes to violate the property rights of Texas Central.

The right to property means the freedom to create, attain, use, trade, and dispose of material values. This includes the freedom to use whatever technology one deems appropriate.

More fundamentally, there is no balance between eminent domain and property rights. Eminent domain forces an owner to “sell” his property, regardless of his own desires.

If legislators are truly interested in protecting property rights, they would eliminate the use of eminent domain by private companies. Instead, they believe that they can protect property rights by violating property rights.

Similar Posts

  • Friday Roundup 7-16-21

    Writing in the Washington Times, George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin addresses the issue of “just compensation” required under the Fifth Amendment when eminent domain is used to seize property. Somin notes that courts typically equate “just compensation” with “fair market value.” However, many owners attach a value to their property far above what…

  • The More Things Change…

    In 1993, during the final months of the last attempt to bring zoning to Houston, I gave a talk to the Houston Property Rights Association titled “Winning the Battle but Losing the War.” In the talk, I warned that without a moral defense of property rights, we might defeat the upcoming referendum, but zoning advocates…

  • The War on the Republic

    Regressives (they call themselves “Progressives”) have long opposed the system of limited government established by the drafters of the Constitution. As one example, the Seventeenth Amendment, which established direct elections of United States Senators, was ratified in 1913 at the height of the first “Progressive” movement. Prior to that time, Senators were selected by each…

  • Davy Versus Davis

    This was originally posted on PoodleRose on July 15, 2013. Comments have not been migrated. In an opinion piece on CNN.com, Texas State Sen. Wendy Davis decries a Republican proposal to close 90 percent of the state-funded women’s clinics, after previously closing fifty such clinics: Real Texans don’t want any woman to lose control of…