Swifties: You Can’t Always Get What You Want

Taylor Swift fans, aka “Swifties,” should learn a lesson from Mick Jagger. Specifically, you can’t always get what you want.

Many Swifties are upset with Ticketmaster and are suing the company for “anti-competitive” practices regarding ticket sales for Swift’s 2023 tour. According to CNN, plaintiffs are alleging that

Ticketmaster forces [bold added] concertgoers to exclusively use its site and controlled all registration and access to Swift’s “The Eras Tour.”

The lawsuit also claims that since Ticketmaster has agreements with large stadiums, Swift “has no choice” [bold added] but to work with Ticketmaster.

Plaintiffs would like us to believe that they and Swift are victims of Ticketmaster’s coercive policies. This would certainly be a reason to be upset, if it were true. It isn’t.

Ticketmaster doesn’t and can’t force anyone to use its service. It doesn’t and can’t force stadiums to have exclusivity agreements. It doesn’t and can’t force performing artists to play only at venues to which it has exclusivity agreements. In other words, Ticketmaster doesn’t and can’t force anyone to do anything. Both Swift and her fans have choices.

On the first day that tickets for the tour went on sale last November, millions of fans went to the Ticketmaster website. The company has stated that the “unprecedented traffic” crashed its site. Countless fans spent hours trying to purchase tickets, often to no avail. And this is the source of the anger being directed at Ticketmaster.

It is understandable that Swifties are disappointed that they were unable to purchase tickets. To the plaintiffs, that disappointment is evidence that somebody did something wrong and their rights were violated. To the plaintiffs, if you can’t get what you want, then you should sue. If you can’t get what you want, then force someone to provide it.

The plaintiffs are asking for damages of $2,500 each. Which means, they want to use actual coercion to force Ticketmaster to compensate them for their disappointment. Mick Jagger was right. You can’t always get what you want. Swifties would add, but if you sue sometimes you might find you get what you need.

Similar Posts

  • Anti-discrimination Laws are Anti-choice

    Discrimination means recognizing the difference between to or more things. Every choice that we make is an act of discrimination. To oppose discrimination is to oppose freedom of choice. Anti-discrimination laws are anti-choice. As an example, consider laws that prohibit “source of income” discrimination in housing. Such laws force landlords to accept housing vouchers, regardless…

  • The Quality of Life Coalition

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on February 11, 2009. Comments have not been migrated. The Quality of Life Coalition (QLC) is an umbrella organization of civic, business, and charitable organizations dedicated to making Houston a better city. This sounds laudable, until we examine what they advocate, and how they propose to achieve their…

  • Caught in the Crossfire

    When government expands its powers beyond its legitimate purpose of protecting individual rights, unintended consequences are unleashed. When various levels of government use those powers for different goals, the individual is invariably caught in the crossfire. Government’s response to the pandemic is one example. Early in the pandemic, states and localities across the nation ordered…

  • Using People as Pawns

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott have recently made headlines for sending immigrants to “sanctuary states,” i.e., states that do not cooperate with federal immigration officials. Both claim that they are trying to send a message to Joe Biden. In truth, they are simply playing to their base and using people as…

  • |

    When We Disagree

    Every violation of property rights, from zoning to eminent domain, from minimum wage to occupational licensing, ultimately stems from a disagreement regarding the creation, use, or trade of material values. And the solution proposed by the advocates of every violation of property rights is essentially the same: Use government to force those with whom they…

  • When Tiger was Truly Selfish

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on March 1, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. During his public apology for marital infidelity, Tiger Woods blamed his actions on “selfishness”. I thought of nobody but myself, he declared. As I pointed out last week, his actions were anything but selfish. Interestingly, Tiger has been truly…