The Cops aren’t the Problem

We often hear complaints about the manner in which police officers enforce certain laws. For example, in Georgia, police arrested Jeff Gray for holding a sign declaring “God bless the homeless vets” in front the Alpharetta City Hall. An attorney for The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), which is representing Gray, said, “If our cities won’t teach officers to do their job properly, FIRE will.” However, the cops aren’t the problem. The problem is the laws that they are asked to enforce.

In the case of Gray, the city has an ordinance requiring individuals to obtain permission from government officials to have a “parade, procession, or demonstration.” It could certainly be argued that a single man holding a sign is not a parade, procession, or demonstration and officers should have exercised some discretion. However, if the law did not exist, this would be a non-issue.

The same is true of drug laws. In such cases, officers are asked to arrest people for the possession of certain drugs, even if the individuals are not violating the rights of others. The cops aren’t the problem. Drug laws are.

In both of these examples, and many others, individuals are not free to act on their own judgment. They are required to act only as government officials allow. And the cops are required to enforce these demands to toe the line.

Rather than attack the police, we should be attacking laws that require us to obtain permission before living as we choose. We should be attacking the premise that government should protect us from ourselves. We should be attacking the premise that individuals should put aside that put aside their personal desires and interests in servitude to the “public interest.”

The only proper purpose of government is the protection of individual rights. Individual rights protect our freedom to live as we choose, so long as we respect the freedom of others to do the same. But when government moves beyond that purpose, the police are asked to enforce inappropriate and immoral laws. The cops aren’t the problem. The laws that they are asked to enforce are.

Similar Posts

  • |

    If I Were Mayor

    This was originally posted in a series on Live Oaks in March 2009. Comments have not been migrated. Last week it came to light that the city was considering a plan to help potential home buyers pay off debt in an effort to improve their credit scores. Though that plan was quickly pulled following public…

  • Tea Parties and Coalitions

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on April 17, 2009. Comments have not been migrated. I attended the Houston Tea Party on Wednesday, and along with a dozen friends distributed 150 copies of Atlas Shrugged and a similar number of pamphlets such as “Man’s Rights”. At an organizational meeting for the Tea Party, the…

  • Freedom for the Fishermen

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on October 2, 2009. Comments have not been migrated. Earlier this week Chronicle columnist Lisa Falkenberg provided us with a look into the state’s food stamp program. Texas isn’t coming close to meeting federal requirements to process food stamp applications within a month. Last month, about 38,000 new…

  • Bigots, Homophobes, and HERO

    Last week, Houston City Council passed the controversial Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (HERO). The ordinance makes it “unlawful for any place of public accommodation or any employee or agent thereof to discriminate against any person on the basis of any protected characteristic,” such as sexual orientation or gender identification. As is usually the case, debate…

  • |

    TLC Thinks Some Consumers are Stupid

    The Texas Lottery Commission (TLC) is suing a Houston-area distiller for trademark infringement. The commission owns a trademark on the phrase “Texas Two Step.” The distiller wants to market a handmade vodka called “Texas Two Step.” But that is where the similarities end. Trademarks do not prohibit others from using a phrase. They do prohibit…