Freedom of Speech Must be Inviolate

Byjbp

Israeli businessman Shlomo Kramer recently called upon governments to take control of all social media platforms. Such a measure is needed, he claimed, to stop “polarization” and prevent the spread of lies. “We need to stack,” he explained, “rank the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online and take control over what they are saying, based on that ranking.” He added, “And we need to educate people against lies.”

Kramer’s concern about the ease with which misinformation and disinformation can be spread on social media is a valid concern. And educating people to discern truth from fiction is desirable. However, the solution isn’t controlling what people can say and allowing government officials to be the arbiters of truth.

Government officials are neither omniscient nor immune to political pressures. They make errors, and they often make decisions based on their political beliefs. To believe that government censors will be impartial and objective is intellectually dishonest.

Kramer claimed that “it’s time to limit the First Amendment in order to protect it.” To argue for an exception to a principle is to reject that principle. To limit the First Amendment is to reject the principle of free speech. If we allow limits to free speech on social media today, we will see limits on free speech in newspapers, television, books, and every other form of expression tomorrow.

The First Amendment protects our freedom to express ideas that are not popular. It protects our freedom to express ideas that others may call lies. Freedom of speech enables us to express ideas without reprisal or restrictions from the government.

The solution to disinformation and misinformation isn’t censorship. The solution is the truth, and for the truth to be be expressed, freedom of speech must be inviolate.

Similar Posts

  • Challenge the Morality

    ByBrian Phillips

    Virginia Democrats are backing a bill that would extend taxpayer-paid healthcare to illegal immigrants. Not surprisingly, Republicans are objecting to the bill, but they won’t challenge the morality that underlies it–altruism. One state Senator said, They want to grant illegal immigrants driver’s licenses that are valid for up to eight years. Now, they’re also working…

  • Loneliness and Altruism

    Byjbp

    In 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General issued a report titled “Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation.” The report found that nearly half of American adults experience “measurable levels of loneliness.” This topic was discussed at a Jefferson Dinner I recently attended. Being a member of a community of people who share our interests, goals, or…

  • Altruism’s ”Rebels”

    ByBrian Phillips

    As more employers are requiring employees to get vaccinated for COVID-19 or submit to regular testing, employees are fighting back with lawsuits. Among the most frequent reasons given is: “It’s my right to not get vaccinated.” On the surface, these individuals may seem to be altruism’s “rebels.” It is true that individuals have a right…

  • The Cost of Compromise

    ByBrian Phillips

    In modern politics, compromise is widely regarded as a virtue. “Reaching across the aisle”–working with one’s political opponents, is seen as the paradigm of leadership. But compromise is neither a virtue nor leadership. It is moral cowardice. In any compromise between good and evil, only the evil will win. For example, let us say that…

  • |

    The Great Shopping Cart Theft

    ByBrian Phillips

    CNN reports that cities across the nation are cracking down on abandoned shopping carts. They are fining retailers and imposing storage fees for carts the municipality collects. Some are also fining individuals who remove carts from store property, but most are putting responsibility for the great shopping cart theft on retailers. City officials argue that…