|

Private Property and Private Walls

While property owners in Texas are fighting the federal government’s attempts to seize their property to build a border wall, a legislator in Arizona has proposed a bill that would exempt property owners from building codes if they choose to build a wall on their own property. While the Texas Institute for Property Rights opposes a border wall, it completely supports the right of property owners to build a wall on their own land.

The right to property means the freedom to create, attain, use, keep, and trade material values. Property owners have a moral right to use their property as they choose, so long as they do not infringe on the freedom of other property owners to do the same. Building a barrier on one’s property to prevent unwelcome entry, does not inherently violate anyone’s rights. This is true whether one builds a fence around one’s yard or a wall.

But this has not stopped some government officials in Arizona from opposing the proposed bill.

Yuma County Supervisor Tony Reyes called the proposal “pretty dumb.” He said he was concerned about “that liability issue about building something without a permit without anybody checking, making sure that the public is protected.”

The question, Reyes said, is what happens if the structure falls.

“This is not a property rights issue,” he said. “It’s a health and safety issue.”

Reyes claims to be concerned about protecting “the public.” But “the public” does not breach barriers on private property. Trespassers do. Whether those trespassers are immigrants from Mexico or Anglo Americans is irrelevant. And trespassers, like all criminals, must be held responsible for their actions.

We will not always agree with how others choose to use their property. But if we want the freedom to use our land as we choose, then we must support and defend the freedom of others to do the same.

Similar Posts

  • A Call to Breed Slaves

    CNN reports that Japan’s birth rate has fallen to a record low while deaths are increasing due to an aging population. In January, the country’s Prime Minister issued a call to breed slaves. Admittedly, he didn’t word it quite like that. But if we look below the cliches, that is precisely what he suggested. The…

  • A Lack of Consistency

    In the most recent legislative session, Texas lawmakers passed several bills intended to strengthen property rights. At the same time, they passed at least one bill that represents a gross infringement of property rights. That inconsistency indicates that legislators really don’t understand what the right to property means. Property rights protect our freedom to create,…

  • Roadside Robbery

    Civil asset forfeiture is a process by which law enforcement agencies can seize private property that they suspect has been obtained by or used in the commission of a crime. The property owner must then fight to regain his property. Unlike criminal cases, in civil asset forfeiture, the burden of proof is on the property…

  • Caught in the Crossfire

    When government expands its powers beyond its legitimate purpose of protecting individual rights, unintended consequences are unleashed. When various levels of government use those powers for different goals, the individual is invariably caught in the crossfire. Government’s response to the pandemic is one example. Early in the pandemic, states and localities across the nation ordered…

  • Democracy and Libraries

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on July 12, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. In an effort to balance their budgets, cities across the nation are reducing the money they spend on public libraries. Not surprisingly, the Chronicle finds this “alarming”: For Americans of limited means, and that includes many Houstonians, public libraries…