The Freedom to Choose

Both “progressives” and conservatives speak about the freedom to choose. Yet, they do so very selectively. They adamantly support an individual’s freedom to choose in regard to some issues, and then are equally adamant in opposing an individual’s freedom to choose in regard to other issues.

For example, “progressives” support an individual’s freedom to choose a romantic partner, regardless of the sex of the individuals involved. Conservatives are generally opposed to gay marriage, and often, homosexuality. On the other hand, conservatives support choice in education, while “progressives” are vehemently opposed to any proposal that gives parents and students more choices. Why? Why are both “progressives” and conservatives inconsistent when it comes to freedom of choice?

Both believe that, because some individuals will make poor (or in their view immoral) choices in regard to certain issues, choices and/or the freedom to act on one’s choices should be restricted.

But the restrictions apply to everyone: the responsible and the irresponsible, the informed and the ignorant, the ambitious and the slothful. The restrictions do not protect the irresponsible, the ignorant, and the slothful. But they do place shackles on the responsible, the informed, and the ambitious.

Freedom of choice, consistently applied, means the freedom of each individual to choose the values that will bring him happiness, as well as the means for attaining those values. Of course, he must respect the freedom of others to do the same. Morally, he cannot impose his choices on others though bullets or ballots.

If you want the freedom to live as we choose, then you must accept the fact that others will make choices with which you disagree. If you don’t want that freedom, or can’t accept that fact, North Korea would welcome you with open arms.