The Real Meaning of the Declaration of Independence

For most Americans, July 4th is a time to celebrate the nation’s independence from Great Britain. Certainly, that was the prominent aspect of the Declaration of Independence. But more fundamentally, the Founding Fathers declared the independence of the individual from the State.

Through human history, and even in most of the world today, the individual is subservient to the State. The Founders rejected this view, boldly declaring that all individuals possess certain unalienable rights. The purpose of government is to protect those rights.

Rights protect the freedom of individuals to act as they deem best, so long as they respect the same rights of others. This is the meaning of the Founders assertion that all individuals have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Sadly, a growing number of Americans believe that individuals should be subservient to the State. They believe that individuals should be forced to act contrary to their own judgment. They believe that individuals should seek the permission of government before engaging in certain professions through occupational licensing. They believe that government should control and restrict businesses, such as short-term rentals. They believe that money should be forcibly taken from producers to pay for the health care, education, and housing of others.

In each of the above examples, as well as countless others, the individual is forced to act, not as he thinks best, but as government officials dictate. The Founding Fathers were brave men who risked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor in the defense of individual rights. If we wish to honor them, we must embrace the cause for which they fought–the independence of the individual from the State.

Similar Posts

  • Systemic Racism

    It is difficult to read anything written by a Leftist without seeing the words “systemic racism” used to explain an issue. Systemic racism is blamed when a white police officer kills a black thug resisting arrest. When a black woman is raising her children without the father, the cause is systemic racism. When a black…

  • Wanna Bet?

    The recent Supreme Court ruling striking down a federal law that prohibited most states from allowing betting on sporting events was a double-edged sword. While it struck down a right-violating law, it will do nothing to prevent states from violating individual rights. According to CNN, The court said the federal law violated constitutional principles limiting…

  • Regulations Impede Rationality

    A liberal friend was recently lamenting personnel decisions being made at her workplace. I pointed out that, in a free market, irrational decisions are ultimately punished in the marketplace. But, she replied, most people aren’t rational, and therefore we need regulations to protect individuals from the irrational. While I would agree that her premise—most people…

  • Individual Rights and Discrimination

    The advocates of anti-discrimination legislation believe that individuals should be protected from unfairness and stupidity. They want government to prohibit actions that they deem to be wrong or offensive. They want government to protect their “rights.” For example, blacks, women, and gays have all demanded special laws that prohibit discrimination against them, and they have…

  • They Should Do Something

    According to Gallup, America’s trust in the federal government has steadily declined over the past fifty years. In May 1972, 70 percent of Americans had a “great deal” or a “fair amount” of trust that the federal government could successfully deal with domestic problems. In September 2019, that number had dropped to 50 percent. Yet,…