The Real Meaning of the Declaration of Independence

For most Americans, July 4th is a time to celebrate the nation’s independence from Great Britain. Certainly, that was the prominent aspect of the Declaration of Independence. But more fundamentally, the Founding Fathers declared the independence of the individual from the State.

Through human history, and even in most of the world today, the individual is subservient to the State. The Founders rejected this view, boldly declaring that all individuals possess certain unalienable rights. The purpose of government is to protect those rights.

Rights protect the freedom of individuals to act as they deem best, so long as they respect the same rights of others. This is the meaning of the Founders assertion that all individuals have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Sadly, a growing number of Americans believe that individuals should be subservient to the State. They believe that individuals should be forced to act contrary to their own judgment. They believe that individuals should seek the permission of government before engaging in certain professions through occupational licensing. They believe that government should control and restrict businesses, such as short-term rentals. They believe that money should be forcibly taken from producers to pay for the health care, education, and housing of others.

In each of the above examples, as well as countless others, the individual is forced to act, not as he thinks best, but as government officials dictate. The Founding Fathers were brave men who risked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor in the defense of individual rights. If we wish to honor them, we must embrace the cause for which they fought–the independence of the individual from the State.

Similar Posts

  • Deja Vu

    In the last Texas legislative session, great controversy erupted over Austin’s attempts to reign in local governments. Bills were introduced to prohibit local controls over plastic bags, trees, short-term rentals, and more. Local governments claimed that these efforts by the state usurped their authority. A similar controversy has erupted in California. California State Senator Scott…

  • |

    The Choices We Make

    In any discussion regarding public policy, we must consider the full context. In regard to affordable housing, the full context includes the choices that individuals make. Housing advocates conveniently ignore this issue. They point to poor families paying a large percentage of their income for housing, but fail to address the choices that have led…

  • An Insensitive A-hole

    Even in normal times, it can be extremely difficult to make certain statements without being considered an insensitive a-hole. In these days of a pandemic, that has become even more true. Those who question the government’s actions are quickly labeled as caring more about money than people. But sometimes such statements need to made if…

  • A Conflict of “Rights”

    Last week, the Trump Administration allowing employers to quit offering no-cost birth control as a part of employee insurance policies. According to the Houston Chronicle, reaction was swift and divided: “President Trump is demonstrating his commitment to undoing the anti-faith policies of the previous administration and restoring true religious freedom,” said Tony Perkins, president of…