Who is Getting Hammered?

This was originally posted on Live Oaks on June 30, 2010. Comments have not been migrated.

I previously addressed issues with Sheltering Arms Senior Services (SASS), a local outfit that is using taxpayer loot to make private homes more energy efficient. At the time SASS was under fire for performing sub-par work and Chronicle columnist Lisa Falkenberg was whining that SASS officials were not being held accountable. In my post I wrote:

I can only assume that Falkenberg wants SASS to be held accountable to the government officials overseeing the program, and ultimately the taxpayers who are footing the bill. That might sound reasonable–no sensible person wants to see government waste the money it has stolen from the citizenry.

It now appears that someone might be held “accountable” for the crummy work. Texas Watchdog reports (HT: blogHouston) that the weatherization director for SASS has been canned. Falkenberg might be happy, but I’m not impressed.

Texas Watchdog reports that SASS is the state’s second leading recipient of stolen money–$22.3 million–for weatherizing private homes. The Alamo Area Council of Governments in San Antonio is getting $14.5 million, while the city and county of Dallas each are receiving more than $13 million. But the “winner” in the race to fleece taxpayers is the city of Houston, coming in at a cool $23.5 million.

I am sure that a lot of people feel better now that an incompetent manager has been fired. But that won’t change the fact that the money being spent by SASS was taken from taxpayers without their consent, for purposes that they may or may not agree with. It doesn’t change the fact that many taxpayers will be unable to afford their own weatherization projects because they had money forcibly removed from their wallets so that Granny Smith could have her windows caulked.

If Granny Smith marched over to her neighbor’s house with a shotgun and took his money so that she could pay to have her windows caulked, she would rightfully be regarded as a thief. That doesn’t change simply because the government does the taking.

It has been reported that SASS spent 60% of its “revenues” on administration for the weatherization program. That money is gone, consumed by parasites sucking the life out of productive, tax paying citizens. If that isn’t bad enough, we are being told that this parasitism will “stimulate” the economy. Granny Smith might have gotten her windows caulked, but taxpayers are getting hammered.

Similar Posts

  • |

    When We Disagree

    Every violation of property rights, from zoning to eminent domain, from minimum wage to occupational licensing, ultimately stems from a disagreement regarding the creation, use, or trade of material values. And the solution proposed by the advocates of every violation of property rights is essentially the same: Use government to force those with whom they…

  • Abbott’s Consistency

    Like most of the nation’s governors, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott declared a state of emergency when the pandemic first started. He then promptly shut down much of the state’s economy in an effort to stop the spread of the coronavirus. A year later, Abbott was one of the first governors to remove mask mandates and…

  • The Tyranny of Nullification

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on March 23, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. I have previously written that nullification–a state declaring a particular federal law unconstitutional and thereby inapplicable within that state–would ultimately lead to tyranny. But we do not need to rely solely on theoretic arguments to see the truth of…

  • After Today Comes Tomorrow

    We are constantly presented with some “crisis,” some issue that the media, activists, and politicians claim requires immediate attention and action. They focus on some problem, whether real or imagined, and argue that we must do something. Today. But after today comes tomorrow. Certainly, there are times in life when immediate action is necessary to…

  • Divide and Conquer

    Environmentalists like to talk about thinking globally but act locally. The point is to think about the big picture but act within one’s community to make a difference, and this has been an effective strategy. The flip side of this coin is to think locally and act without principles. This strategy focuses on the moment…