A Solution to Displacement

One of the primary complaints about gentrification is the displacement of the existing residents in a neighborhood. To reduce displacement, a growing number of cities are requiring developers to include affordable housing in exchange for permission to build a new housing project.  These mandates violate the property rights of developers by interfering with their freedom to produce and trade. There is, however, a solution to displacement that does not violate property rights.

When gentrification occurs in a neighborhood, property values rise. And, as property values increase, so do property taxes. Many of the property owners in gentrifying neighborhoods are on fixed incomes and cannot afford the higher tax bills. They must sell their home. While the developers responsible for gentrification are often blamed, the real culprits are the taxing authorities.

A solution to displacement is tax relief for the existing  property owners.

Tax relief could take different forms. One way is to limit increases in a property’s taxed value. For example, the increase in a property’s appraised value could be limited to 1 percent per year. Another form of tax relief is an exemption similar to the homestead exemption in Texas (and perhaps in other states as well). In Texas, the homestead exemption reduces a property’s taxed value by $25,000. While this amount would provide little relief if a property’s value doubles or triples, another number could be used.

Regardless of the form tax relief takes, government officials have the power to reduce or even eliminate displacement caused by skyrocketing property taxes. And they can do this while respecting property rights. They can respect the right of developers to use their property as they choose and also respect the rights of the existing property owners by taking less of their money.

The only “loser” in providing tax relief would be the government. While many public officials decry displacement resulting from gentrification, they eagerly accept the higher property taxes gentrification produces. If government officials truly want to slow displacement, then they should prove it by putting the taxpayers’ money where the officials’ mouth is. And that means tax relief.

Similar Posts

  • An Amendment in St. Paul

    An Amendment in St. Paul When voters approved one of the nation’s most draconian rent control laws, developers in St. Paul reacted exactly as had been predicted: they halted housing projects. In September, the St. Paul City Council amended the rent control ordinance to exempt properties less than twenty years old. This returns a smidgen…

  • A Flawed Framework

    As I point out in my book, The Affordable Housing Crisis: Causes and Cures, for more than one hundred years housing policy has been dominated by the same flawed framework. Each “new” housing policy simply repeats policies that have previously failed. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is an example. He ran on a promise…

  • The Siren Call of Altruism

    In an opinion piece on Politico, housing advocates Cea Weaver and Paul Williams argue that “democrats would be fools to slash Biden’s housing plan.” At a proposed cost of $327 billion, that housing plan, along with other entitlements proposed by Biden, are part of “long-overdue expansions of the welfare state.” Not surprisingly, the authors do…

  • In Defense of Discrimination

    In a previous post, we examined a Maryland law that prohibits landlords from asking prospective tenants about certain types of criminal convictions. Now, both Savannah, Georgia, and New Jersey are considering similar laws. Supporters claim that those with a criminal history face difficulties finding work and housing and this constitutes discrimination. Damn straight it is…

  • The Subjective Nature of Rent Control

    In the few months since St. Paul’s draconian rent control law went into effect, landlords, tenants, government officials, and housing activists have all expressed displeasure and confusion with the ordinance. The latest confusion revolves around the process to appeal for a rent increase greater than that allowed by law. And it illustrates the subjective nature…