The Means are not Justified by the Ends

No decent person wants to see others struggle to afford safe, decent housing. But this does not mean that we should embrace any policy—such as rent control—that keeps rents more affordable. The means are not justified by the ends.

In evaluating any issue, we must consider the full context—all of the relevant information. If we examine rent control only from the perspective of tenants, then we would reasonably conclude that rent control is a good thing. It does, in fact, keep rents at a more affordable level. But there is much more to the story.

It is a well-documented fact that rent control leads to a decline in both the quantity and the quality of rental housing. But rent control advocates are not concerned with the long-term. They see a problem today, and they want a remedy today. They are unconcerned with the full context.

As one example, the advocates of rent control look at only one side of the affordability equation—the cost of housing. However, the affordability of housing is determined by two factors—the cost of housing and a household’s income. A household that makes $100,000 a year has a lot more housing options than a household earning $25,000. Housing activists refuse to address this fact.

Instead, they give us examples of a poor family with four children. The parents often work in jobs that pay little more than the minimum wage. We are then cajoled to feel sorry for them because they struggle to find affordable housing. If somebody suggests that the parents should have waited until their financial situation improved to have children, the suggestion is dismissed as racist and sexist. We are supposed to believe that counseling individuals to make good choices is a form of bigotry.

Individuals have a right to have children. They do not have a right to force others to support those children. Similarly, individuals have a right to obtain affordable housing. They do not have a right to force landlords to subsidize that housing. The means are not justified by the ends.

Similar Posts

  • A State of Denial

    In November 2021, voters in St. Paul approved one of the nation’s most stringent rent control laws. The law was later amended  to loosen the controls slightly. However, that did little to motivate the construction of new housing. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) reports that building permits in St. Paul fell…

  • |

    Promises are Cheap

    The Biden Administration has announced plans to build or restore 2 million homes to address the housing shortage. This is a very grand plan, and it is receiving praise from many advocates for low-income housing. However, it is more than likely that the number of homes built or restored will fall far short of the…

  • Bake More Pies

    For more than one hundred years, government officials have decried the difficulty many Americans face when they attempt to buy a home. Indeed, housing affordability has become a rallying cry for both progressives and conservatives. Their solutions invariably involve one scheme or another for how to distribute the existing housing stock. Those solutions will fail,…

  • |

    Jim Crow Redux

    In the late 19th and early 20th century, a series of laws were enacted, primarily in Southern states, that mandated racial segregation. Blacks and whites could not stay in the same hotel, eat in the same dining room, or ride in the same railroad car. Interracial marriage was forbidden, and blacks could not own or…