Mob Rule Rules in California

In 2024, California voters will decide whether to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, which prohibits municipalities from imposing rent control on properties built after 1995. Regardless of the outcome of the election, this is just another in a long string of examples that California is dominated by mob rule.

In California, nearly every activity is subject to the approval of a democratic majority. In California, as in all democracies, the majority may do as it pleases simply because it is the majority. In California, an individual’s life is perpetually threatened by the majority. Landlords are only the latest example.

In 2022, voters were asked whether Californians should be allowed to bet on sports, whether new regulations should be imposed on dialysis clinics, and whether millionaires should be taxed to subsidize the purchase of electric vehicles. All three measures were rejected by voters, but they illustrate the wide variety of ways the rights of individuals are subjected to a vote.

Those who wish to bet on sporting events cannot do so without the permission of the majority. Dialysis clinics can only operate as the majority deems proper. Millionaires cannot use their money as they choose, but only as the majority permits. In these examples, and countless others, individuals cannot act as they think best. They can only act as the majority deems appropriate.

The premise underlying mob rule is that the majority determines what is proper, right, and just.  This relegates individual rights to the status of temporary permissions, which may be revoked whenever the majority deems it appropriate. That is exactly what is happening in California.

Returning to the issue of rent control, landlords who own properties built after 1995 are currently exempt from rent control laws. They currently enjoy some protection of their property rights—the freedom to trade on terms they deem best. But, if the majority of voters decides to repeal Costa-Hawkins, that right will be revoked.

The fact that this is even up for a vote illustrates that rights are only temporary permissions in California. The proposals to impose new regulations on dialysis clinics and tax millionaires to subsidize electric cars are further evidence. For now, clinics and millionaires enjoy some property rights. But as the initiatives on the 2022 ballot show, those rights can be revoked if the majority chooses. Mob rule rules in California.

Similar Posts

  • Those Who Can, Do

    To paraphrase George Bernard Shaw, “Those who can, do; those who can’t, try to control those who can.” Cea Weaver, a housing activists at New York’s Housing Justice for All is a prime example. Weaver has been a leading voice for tenant “protections” in New York, including a “rent stabilization” law—a euphemism for price controls—passed…

  • |

    Less than Ideal

    In October 2020, the Cambridge, Massachusetts, city council enacted a citywide 100 percent affordable housing overly (AHO). The AHO allows apartment buildings up to four stories in all neighborhoods in the city. However, all units must be permanently affordable to households earning up to 100% of area median income. The standard for affordability is paying…

  • Friday Roundup 1-14-22

    Last week, a judge ordered New York State to reopen its portal for rental assistance. The portal was shut down in November. On one hand, the state is dawdling in its efforts to provide relief to tenants (and by extension landlords) impacted by the pandemic. On the other hand, with its eviction moratorium and other…

  • In Defense of Discrimination

    In a previous post, we examined a Maryland law that prohibits landlords from asking prospective tenants about certain types of criminal convictions. Now, both Savannah, Georgia, and New Jersey are considering similar laws. Supporters claim that those with a criminal history face difficulties finding work and housing and this constitutes discrimination. Damn straight it is…

  • The Right to Earn Affordable Housing

    Housing advocates are increasingly demanding more affordable housing for low-income individuals and families. They are doing this under the guise of “tenants’ rights.” But all individuals—including tenants—have rights. Specifically, they have the right to produce or earn more affordable housing. Like any value, housing must be produced. Like any value that one desires, one can…

  • A Shakedown in the ‘Hood

    A coalition of residents, activists, and students is conducting a public shakedown on Rice University because of its Ion technology development building in Houston’s Third Ward. Rice has already given tentative approval to an agreement with the city that would have the university establish a venture fund to provide financing for black and Latino entrepreneurs,…

One Comment

Comments are closed.