The Profit Motive is the Solution to the Housing Crisis

Politicians, pundits, and housing activists have offered a variety of policies for making housing more affordable. While many admit that building affordable housing for low-income households isn’t profitable, virtually nobody recognizes the fact that the profit motive is the solution to the housing crisis. A statement from the president of the National Multifamily Housing Council illustrates this point.

She says that America has relied on private sector investments to build housing at a variety of price points.

But unless that money comes into the market and investors see that as a better investment than some other kind of equity or some other kind of investment, they’re not going to come.

The reason that sufficient money isn’t coming into the market is because the profit motive hasn’t been allowed to operate in the housing market. Rent control is the most obvious example.

Under rent control, an investor’s profit is arbitrarily limited by government edict. When that limit is lower than the return on other investments, money won’t flow into the housing market. The sad irony is, rent control is frequently justified on the grounds that housing producers are making too much profit (as if there is such a thing as too much profit).

Zoning is another example. Under zoning, a property owner can’t use his land as he deems best—most profitably. He can only use his land as the government permits. Again, his profit is arbitrarily limited, and so, the investment doesn’t occur.

If we want more investment in affordable housing, we have to allow the profit motive to operate.

When the demand for a product exceeds the supply, prices and profits rise to clear the market. This attracts new investment to expand production. As production increases, prices moderate and perhaps decline. But this isn’t happening in housing because government policies stifle the potential profit.

Incentivizing investment in affordable housing can only occur when investors are free to pursue the highest possible profits, not those dictated by government officials. We don’t have a shortage of affordable flat screen televisions, smart phones, automobiles, and countless other products. The profit motive incentivizes the production of these values in a variety of price ranges. It is time that we allowed the profit motive to do the same with housing.

Similar Posts

  • Activists are Unhappy

    The city of Elizabeth, New Jersey, recently capped rent increases to 3 percent. The previous cap limited rent increases to $20 or 3 percent, whichever is lower. Tenants and housing activists are unhappy. One activist said, This decision to increase the rental cap, which protects its more vulnerable tenants, shows how the city protects developers…

  • A Victim is Resisting

    On May 1, St. Paul’s draconian rent control ordinance took effect. The law caps rent increases to 3 percent, though property owners can appeal to government officials for a higher increase. In June, Dominium, a local housing producer, notified tenants in one of its apartment buildings that rents would be increasing by 7.97 percent. Tenants…

  • |

    Flipping the Zoning Coin

    One of the increasingly popular tactics that cities are using to address America’s housing shortage is to relax or eliminate single-family zoning (SFZ), also known as exclusionary zoning. Some of those same cities are also starting to use a different form of zoning—inclusionary zoning—to address the housing shortage. In short, this means shifting from mandatory…

  • |

    A Lesson from Rental Aid

    After throwing millions of Americans out of work with lockdowns, the government discovered that many of those individuals could not pay their rent. The government responded with a moratorium on evictions. And then, when landlords began to face economic hardship, the government responded with rent assistance. But according to CNBC, only $5 billion of the…

  • Friday Roundup 6-11-21

    In an editorial, the Los Angeles Times has called for the federal government to dramatically expand its housing subsidy program (often called Section 8). Currently, the Los Angeles Housing Authority administers 58,000 Section 8 vouchers. However, the authority estimates that 600,000 vouchers are needed to provide vouchers to everyone who qualifies. If the Housing Authority…

  • The Roundup 7

    How Informed are Voters? A recent survey found that American voters are generally misinformed on a wide range of political issues. The report stated, “On average, voters gave the correct answer 40% of the time, gave an incorrect answer 53% of the time, and said they were unsure 7% of the time. A majority of…