What Erratic Policies Accomplish

Since January, Americans have been subjected to a constant stream of erratic policies from the Trump Administration. Most commentators focus on the latest outrage and point out the contradictions, evasions, or misrepresentations in those policies. Rather than try to understand the rationale, or lack thereof, behind these policies, we should ask what erratic policies accomplish. Tariffs provide an illuminating example.

On a seemingly daily basis, Trump announces new tariffs, the removal of tariffs, or new tariff levels. Nobody knows what he will do or when he will do it. And creating uncertainty is the purpose. As Ayn Rand wrote,

It is a grave error to suppose that a dictatorship rules a nation by means of strict, rigid laws which are obeyed and enforced with rigorous, military precision. Such a rule would be evil, but almost bearable; men could endure the harshest edicts, provided these edicts were known, specific and stable; it is not the known that breaks men’s spirits, but the unpredictable. A dictatorship has to be capricious; it has to rule by means of the unexpected, the incomprehensible, the wantonly irrational; it has to deal not in death, but in sudden death; a state of chronic uncertainty is what men are psychologically unable to bear.

Consider the actions of ICE as another example. Immigrants live in perpetual fear that they or their loved ones will suddenly be kidnapped by masked thugs, denied due process, and sent to a foreign prison. Immigrants may be the target today, but if due process can be denied to anyone, it can be denied to everyone.

The explanations offered by the Administration for these policies are merely a pretense. Reviving American industry or protecting us from immigrants is not the real purpose. Instilling uncertainty and fear is. We are being conditioned to accept uncertainty and fear as normal. And that is what erratic policies accomplish.

Similar Posts

  • The Political Actors Change…

    The political actors change, but the script remains essentially the same. Over time, different individuals occupy the stage, but the principles upon which they act remain consistent. Consider the policies supported by Obama, Trump, and Biden. Obama imposed controls and restrictions on energy producers in an attempt to foster “renewable” energy. He did not hesitate…

  • More Sticks and Fewer Carrots

    Last week, I wrote about the government’s use of carrots and sticks to manipulate the behavior of home buyers. Now, in response to Trump’s new health care plan, a physician is calling for more sticks and fewer carrots regarding health care insurance. Trump has proposed sending money directly to Americans rather than to insurance companies….

  • The Fairness Doctrine 2.0

    Brendan Carr, Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has implicitly announced a revival of the Fairness Doctrine. Introduced in 1949, the Fairness Doctrine required broadcasters to present different viewpoints on controversial subjects. When the doctrine was repealed in 1987, radio stations could air programs by conservatives such as Rush Limbaugh without being forced to…

  • Calls for Censorship

    In July, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz added his voice to the calls for censorship when he introduced the Stop Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots (Stop FUNDERs) Act. The bill, he told Fox News, would allow the Department of Justice to prosecute those who fund protests “which may well turn into riots.”  Interestingly,…