|

Why Texas Should Abolish Exclusionary Zoning

Cities across Texas are struggling with a severe shortage of low- and moderate-income housing. One of the primary causes is exclusionary zoning, i.e., single-family zoning, which makes duplexes, accessory dwelling units, and similar types of housing illegal. Fundamentally, the state’s housing shortage is being caused by violations of property rights—restrictions on how property owners can use their land. That shortage can be remedied if legislators abolish exclusionary zoning.

Legislators have previously reined in local ordinances that violated property rights. In 2014, the legislature stepped in after Denton passed an anti-fracking ordinance. In 2016, legislators essentially voided Austin’s ordinance requiring strong background checks for ride sharing companies like Uber. In 2017, legislators passed a law restricting local tree ordinances. The legislature was correct to intervene for the purpose of protecting property rights. The legislature must now intervene and abolish exclusionary zoning in the state of Texas.

Like the advocates of banning fracking, regulating ride sharing companies, and protecting trees, the defenders of exclusionary zoning argue for local control over community affairs. However, when local ordinances violate rights, including property rights, state legislators have a responsibility to overturn those laws. Local control does not justify local tyranny.

Single-family zoning is one of the most egregious violations of property rights still permitted in Texas. The ordinances mentioned above were harmful, but that harm pales in comparison to the injury caused by single-family zoning. The victims of exclusionary zoning are not just the property owners who are prohibited from using their land as they desire. In preventing the most productive use of land, exclusionary zoning drives up the cost of housing for every Texan.

Texas has long enjoyed one of the nation’s most robust economies. In protecting property rights, the legislature deserves credit for creating and maintaining an environment that enables individuals and businesses to flourish. Texas has shown the nation, and the world, what low taxes and minimal regulations can do. It is time to show the nation, and the world, what abolishing exclusionary zoning can do.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Less than Ideal

    In October 2020, the Cambridge, Massachusetts, city council enacted a citywide 100 percent affordable housing overly (AHO). The AHO allows apartment buildings up to four stories in all neighborhoods in the city. However, all units must be permanently affordable to households earning up to 100% of area median income. The standard for affordability is paying…

  • |

    Jim Crow Redux

    In the late 19th and early 20th century, a series of laws were enacted, primarily in Southern states, that mandated racial segregation. Blacks and whites could not stay in the same hotel, eat in the same dining room, or ride in the same railroad car. Interracial marriage was forbidden, and blacks could not own or…

  • The Elephant in the Room

    Housing activists frequently proclaim that a household earning the minimum wage cannot afford a two-bedroom apartment. This is the elephant in the room that housing activists refuse to address. As an example, the executive director of the Capital Area Housing Partnership in Michigan writes, The fair market rent for a modest two-bedroom apartment in the…

  • |

    The Nature of Zoning

    In the mid-2000s, residents of Hobbs, New Mexico were debating a proposal to implement comprehensive zoning. I was hired as a consultant to fight the proposed zoning ordinance. The article below was published in the local newspaper. $ $ $ The Maddox Foundation has offered a grant of $15 million to the City of Hobbs…

  • Claims without Evidence

    Progressives Regresssives are renowned for making claims and not providing evidence. Propogandist Patrick Range McDonald provides an example in an article titled “Corporate landlords’ misinformation campaign to stop rent control.” Including the headline, on eight occasions McDonald claims that opponents of rent control are engaged in lies, disinformation, or misinformation. Despite the repetitive claims, he…

  • Freedom of Choice and Segregation

    In the early twentieth century, cities across the nation began enacting zoning ordinances that prohibited blacks from buying a home in a predominantly white neighborhood and vice versa. Beginning in the 1930s, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) refused to insure mortgages for black homeowners. For decades, at both the federal and local level, government essentially…