Friday Roundup 10-15-21

It is easy to find things about California’s government to criticize. While the legislature hasn’t done a U-turn and reversed all of its rights-violating laws, they have recently taken steps in the right direction. SB9 and SB10 restored a little freedom to property owners by allowing for greater housing density. And on October 1, Gov. Newsome signed into law a plan to return “public” land to the descendants of its rightful owners. In 1912, Willa and Charles Bruce bought land along Santa Monica Bay. The black entrepreneurs built a resort catering to other blacks at a time they weren’t allowed on most beaches. In 1924, the city used eminent domain to seize the land for the alleged purpose of creating a park. The park was never built, and the land was eventually transferred to Los Angeles County. Though this measure is too long in coming, justice is finally being served.

John Mirisch, a former mayor and current city council member in Beverly Hills, argues that the one element missing from housing discussions is tolerance. California is a very tolerant state, he writes, except when it comes to housing-lifestyle choices. Those who advocate greater housing density are, according to Mirisch, engaged in “thinly-veiled propaganda war on single-family neighborhoods.” He goes on to write that “upzoning” would eliminate personal lifestyle choices. In other words, he believes that dictating how landowners can use their property protects freedom of choice. And restoring their right to use their property as they choose somehow eliminates freedom of choice. As is common among defenders of single-family zoning, Mirisch wants to protect his interests at the expense of others.

At a shareholder’s meeting last week, Elon Musk announced that Tesla is moving its headquarters from California to Texas. Musk has been critical of the pandemic policies in California and has filed suit against Almeda County where a major Tesla factory is located. At the end of last year, Musk moved his residence to Texas. Tesla is not the only company fleeing California for more business-friendly environments. HP, Toyota, and Oracle have moved or announced plans to move from California to Texas. Among the reasons cited are confiscatory taxation, burdensome regulations, and the high cost of housing in California.

Similar Posts

  • Friday Roundup 6-11-21

    In an editorial, the Los Angeles Times has called for the federal government to dramatically expand its housing subsidy program (often called Section 8). Currently, the Los Angeles Housing Authority administers 58,000 Section 8 vouchers. However, the authority estimates that 600,000 vouchers are needed to provide vouchers to everyone who qualifies. If the Housing Authority…

  • |

    A Lesson from U-Haul

    It is no secret that people are fleeing California’s outrageous taxes and onerous business regulations. U-Haul reports that for the fourth consecutive year, California led the nation in the number of outbound truck rentals. The advocates of school choice should learn a lesson from U-Haul. When individuals have freedom of choice, they make choices that…

  • |

    The Roundup 6

    Competing Values The Houston Chronicle recently profiled a couple who have installed synthetic turf in their Houston Heights yard. They were tired of re-sodding their yard, and joined a growing number of property owners turning to artificial grass. It was a decision that they thought best for them. But the Heights is one of Houston’s…

  • |

    Flipping the Zoning Coin

    One of the increasingly popular tactics that cities are using to address America’s housing shortage is to relax or eliminate single-family zoning (SFZ), also known as exclusionary zoning. Some of those same cities are also starting to use a different form of zoning—inclusionary zoning—to address the housing shortage. In short, this means shifting from mandatory…

  • Tilting at Windmills

    Nineteen Austin property owners have filed suit against the city. They claim that efforts to revise the city’s zoning ordinance have violated state law requiring the city to inform property owners of zoning changes and consider their protests against such changes. According to KVUE in Austin: Through the lawsuit, the residents are seeking that the…

  • “Unplanned” Charm in Montrose

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on October 13, 2009. Comments have not been migrated. The American Planning Association recently named Houston’s Montrose one of its “10 Great Neighborhoods” for 2009. The Chronicle laments this award, because the planning that has occurred in Montrose was conducted privately, rather than by the city: As the…