Friday Roundup 10-8-21

In September, California passed SB 10, which allows cities to “upzone” and permit greater housing density in neighborhoods previously zoned for single-family homes. A “housing justice” organization, AHF, has filed a lawsuit that asserts “allowing legislators to override zoning restrictions violates the constitutional right of initiative by allowing local government to repeal or disregard initiative measures put in place by the voters.” AHF believes that voters should be allowed to enact any type of restrictions they choose, including prohibiting greater housing density. Interestingly, a division of AHF is called Housing is a Human Right. So, on one hand AHF wants government to provide everyone with a home. On the other hand, it wants voters to dictate where that housing can be built.

Lawmakers in Washington have introduced a bill titled Keeping Renters Safe Act of 2021. The bill would give the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) the authority to impose a residential eviction moratorium to address public health crises. Further, the bill directs HHS to implement a national eviction moratorium in response to the COVID pandemic that remains in effect for at least sixty days after the crisis ends. Landlords have already suffered through a year of moratoriums (and in some locales even longer). This bill will prolong the agony indefinitely.

During the pandemic, governments across the world have assumed draconian measures to stop the spread of COVID-19. Some of the worst of these rights violating policies occurred in Massachusetts, where the governor issued a series of decrees that generally banned all private gatherings, even in private homes, after 9:30 p.m. unless the assembly was for a political or religious purpose. The orders were challenged in court, and in late 2020 the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts uphold the dictates, stating that slowing the spread of COVID involved a “significant government interest.” As illustrated by the governor’s decrees, “significant government interest” is an arbitrary standard that can be used to justify nearly anything.

Similar Posts

  • |

    A Lesson from Rental Aid

    After throwing millions of Americans out of work with lockdowns, the government discovered that many of those individuals could not pay their rent. The government responded with a moratorium on evictions. And then, when landlords began to face economic hardship, the government responded with rent assistance. But according to CNBC, only $5 billion of the…

  • Friday Roundup 11-19-21

    Legislators in New York are considering a “just cause” eviction bill that opponents have labeled Lease for Life. The bill would prohibit landlords from evicting a tenant as long as the tenant pays the rent, isn’t intentionally damaging the property, and isn’t subletting or violating the lease. The bill would also subject most rental housing in…

  • Tilting at Windmills

    Nineteen Austin property owners have filed suit against the city. They claim that efforts to revise the city’s zoning ordinance have violated state law requiring the city to inform property owners of zoning changes and consider their protests against such changes. According to KVUE in Austin: Through the lawsuit, the residents are seeking that the…

  • |

    Friday Roundup 5-14-21

    One of the latest trends in the “tenants’ rights” movement is to provide free legal representation for tenants facing eviction. Washington state has passed such a law and other states are considering doing so. As with nearly everything associated with “housing justice,” these laws will ultimately create a host of new problems. As one example,…

  • A Crisis Needs Effective Leadership

     “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” Obama’s chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said in 2008. Politicians have long followed that blueprint. The terrorist attacks on 9/11, the Great Recession, and now the pandemic are just the most recent examples. During each crisis government expanded its powers at the expense of individual…

  • Friday Roundup 7-16-21

    Writing in the Washington Times, George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin addresses the issue of “just compensation” required under the Fifth Amendment when eminent domain is used to seize property. Somin notes that courts typically equate “just compensation” with “fair market value.” However, many owners attach a value to their property far above what…