Friday Roundup 10-8-21

In September, California passed SB 10, which allows cities to “upzone” and permit greater housing density in neighborhoods previously zoned for single-family homes. A “housing justice” organization, AHF, has filed a lawsuit that asserts “allowing legislators to override zoning restrictions violates the constitutional right of initiative by allowing local government to repeal or disregard initiative measures put in place by the voters.” AHF believes that voters should be allowed to enact any type of restrictions they choose, including prohibiting greater housing density. Interestingly, a division of AHF is called Housing is a Human Right. So, on one hand AHF wants government to provide everyone with a home. On the other hand, it wants voters to dictate where that housing can be built.

Lawmakers in Washington have introduced a bill titled Keeping Renters Safe Act of 2021. The bill would give the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) the authority to impose a residential eviction moratorium to address public health crises. Further, the bill directs HHS to implement a national eviction moratorium in response to the COVID pandemic that remains in effect for at least sixty days after the crisis ends. Landlords have already suffered through a year of moratoriums (and in some locales even longer). This bill will prolong the agony indefinitely.

During the pandemic, governments across the world have assumed draconian measures to stop the spread of COVID-19. Some of the worst of these rights violating policies occurred in Massachusetts, where the governor issued a series of decrees that generally banned all private gatherings, even in private homes, after 9:30 p.m. unless the assembly was for a political or religious purpose. The orders were challenged in court, and in late 2020 the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts uphold the dictates, stating that slowing the spread of COVID involved a “significant government interest.” As illustrated by the governor’s decrees, “significant government interest” is an arbitrary standard that can be used to justify nearly anything.

Similar Posts

  • Friday Roundup 11-12-21

    City council members in Denver recently became the latest legislative body to demonstrate that a basic knowledge of economics is not necessary to hold an elected office. The council is considering a proposal to require that all new housing developments include below market-rate units in the project. The proposal would also increase the “affordable housing…

  • Balancing Power with a Gun

    Housing advocates frequently talk about the imbalance of power between landlords and renters. Their solution is to use brute force to provide a more “equitable” balance. This policy is founded on the premise that individuals should experience the same results, regardless of their actions or character. As an example, a growing number of jurisdictions are…

  • A Debate on Zoning

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on December 4, 2008. Comments have not been migrated. The comments to a post at Houston Strategies evolved into a lengthy debate over zoning. The debate was civil and interesting. The advocate for zoning presented reasonable arguments which are shared by many people. Below are some excerpts from…

  • The Divisive Nature of Zoning

    The very nature of zoning makes it a magnet for controversy and divisiveness. The latest example has erupted in College Station, where some homeowners want more restrictive land-use regulations to combat gentrification and the growth of student housing. But other homeowners don’t want the restrictions. The dispute is pitting neighbor against neighbor. This is an…

  • Friday Roundup 9-10-21

    In April, Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unveiled the Green New Deal for Public Housing Act. The bill would “invest” $172 billion over 10 years to upgrade over 950,000 public housing units. When the bill was announced, Sanders said, “It is unacceptable that our nation’s public housing is in a state of chronic disrepair and…

  • A Plan that Could have Saved America

    Vanity Fair reports that Jared Kushner, President Trumps son-in-law and advisor, developed a plan to dramatically and rapidly ramp up testing for the cornavirus. A combination of bureaucratic incompetence, political expediency, and intellectual dishonesty caused that plan to be abandoned. Rather than have states fight each other for scarce diagnostic tests and limited lab capacity,…