The Roundup 2

The Echo Chamber
I have recently been giving a lot of thought to the “echo chamber”–the tendency of people to associate primarily with people who share their views. As a result, the information they receive on political issues generally conforms with their beliefs. It becomes a form of political tribalism. While studies have come to mixed conclusions about the number of people trapped in an echo chamber, almost nobody claims that it doesn’t exist. An echo chamber is certainly comfortable. One’s ideas aren’t challenged. One doesn’t need to think, question premises, examine new evidence. One can just spout tired bromides. It would seem that ignorance is indeed bliss.

Arguing vs. Discussing
Anyone interested in politics has undoubtedly engaged in a discussion that quickly turned into an argument. In the end, nobody has changed their mind and everyone is angry. A fundamental cause of this is the failure to identify common goals or values. Too often, we hear someone utter something, and we immediately respond with our disagreement. That is not an invitation for a conversation. It is an incitement for an argument. We fail to identify the goal that they seek to achieve. If we want to have discussions (and perhaps change minds), then we must first seek to find common goals and values. And they exist a lot more than we might think.

Similar Posts

  • Friday Roundup 8-6-21

    Barry Fagin, a Senior Fellow at the Independence Institute in Denver, correctly notes that conservatives are very confused about the meaning of property rights. As examples, he cites Florida Gov. Rick DeSantis’ ban of “vaccine passports” and conservative calls to regulate social media companies like Facebook and Twitter. Fagin concludes that property rights have fallen…

  • Friday Roundup 6-25-21

    City officials in Charleston, South Carolina want to pay homeowners to build accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on their property. Relaxing zoning regulations that limit or prohibit ADUs, also called granny flats or mother-in-law suites, is one way many cities are addressing the shortage of affordable housing. Ending the prohibition on ADUs is a proper step….

  • |

    Friday Roundup 10-22-22

    Charlie Simms, the owner of a development company in Ohio, makes a point that needs to be included in discussions regarding affordable housing. Housing advocates consider affordable housing to mean below market rate housing. However, as Simms writes, “When builders and developers speak of affordable housing we’re talking about how to build homes that the…

  • Friday Roundup 10-1-21

    This summer, Oregon passed a law that prohibits the transmission of love letters. Love letters are written by a prospective home buyer to the owner, and they explain why the buyer loves the home. Oregon lawmakers concluded that “these letters can be a tool of discrimination by including identifying information concerning race, sex or familial…

  • Friday Roundup 5-28-21

    In a post about systemic racism, John McWhorter writes: A science teacher conference in Washington state last year included a PowerPoint slide preaching that “If you conclude that outcome differences by demographic subgroup are a result of anything other than a broken system, that is, by definition, bigotry.” This should have been corrected: “If you…

  • Friday Roundup 7-16-21

    Writing in the Washington Times, George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin addresses the issue of “just compensation” required under the Fifth Amendment when eminent domain is used to seize property. Somin notes that courts typically equate “just compensation” with “fair market value.” However, many owners attach a value to their property far above what…