The Crony Ideology

Both “progressives” and conservatives embrace the crony ideology. That they apply that ideology differently is merely a matter of detail. So, what is the crony ideology?

The essence of the crony ideology is the belief that government force should be used to compel or prohibit certain actions. Every act of cronyism ultimately rests on this belief, and this is true whether the cronyism is practiced by leftists or by conservatives.

Underlying this belief in the use of government force is a more fundamental idea—collectivism. Collectivism holds that the individual is and should be subordinate to the group, such as the tribe, the community, or the nation. According to collectivism, the individual must subordinate his own welfare and interests to those of the group. The group, rather than the individual, is the standard of value.

Altruism is the morality used to justify subservience of the individual to the group. The essence of morality, according to altruism, is self-sacrificial service to others. Collectivism defines who the “others” are—it defines which group will be sacrificed and group will benefit.

“Progressives”and conservatives do not disagree over altruism. Both embrace it. They disagree over which particular group or groups should serve as the standard of value. But they heartily agree that the individual has a moral obligation to sacrifice his interests for the group’s alleged interests. And both frequently use the biggest group of all—the public—to justify their schemes.

It should not be a surprise then, that “progressives” and conservatives use similar language when they defend their policies. Each defends its version of cronyism by proclaiming that it serves the “public interest” or the “national good.”

Similar Posts

  • An Insensitive A-hole

    Even in normal times, it can be extremely difficult to make certain statements without being considered an insensitive a-hole. In these days of a pandemic, that has become even more true. Those who question the government’s actions are quickly labeled as caring more about money than people. But sometimes such statements need to made if…

  • Woman of Color

    This is a guest post by JP Miller In late January we witnessed a brazen low point in the history of the United States. President Joseph Biden announced the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer from the Supreme Court. He would be examining candidates with the best minds, the highest moral character and best records of…

  • The “Public Interest”

    No matter which party or politician backs a particular piece of legislation, its advocates nearly always proclaim that it serves the public interest. And opponents are just as quick to claim that the legislation is harmful to the public interest. The Keystone XL pipeline serves as an example. For years, the pipeline was a controversial…

  • Giving Thanks to Big Pharma

    This week, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, a body established by the World Health Organization, released a paper that argues that “global health has been ‘left hostage’ to Big Pharma.” Such a claim equates the actions of pharmaceutical companies with the actions of kidnappers. This is a grossly unjust accusation. A kidnapper…

  • The Tyranny of Nullification

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on March 23, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. I have previously written that nullification–a state declaring a particular federal law unconstitutional and thereby inapplicable within that state–would ultimately lead to tyranny. But we do not need to rely solely on theoretic arguments to see the truth of…