The Crony Ideology

Both “progressives” and conservatives embrace the crony ideology. That they apply that ideology differently is merely a matter of detail. So, what is the crony ideology?

The essence of the crony ideology is the belief that government force should be used to compel or prohibit certain actions. Every act of cronyism ultimately rests on this belief, and this is true whether the cronyism is practiced by leftists or by conservatives.

Underlying this belief in the use of government force is a more fundamental idea—collectivism. Collectivism holds that the individual is and should be subordinate to the group, such as the tribe, the community, or the nation. According to collectivism, the individual must subordinate his own welfare and interests to those of the group. The group, rather than the individual, is the standard of value.

Altruism is the morality used to justify subservience of the individual to the group. The essence of morality, according to altruism, is self-sacrificial service to others. Collectivism defines who the “others” are—it defines which group will be sacrificed and group will benefit.

“Progressives”and conservatives do not disagree over altruism. Both embrace it. They disagree over which particular group or groups should serve as the standard of value. But they heartily agree that the individual has a moral obligation to sacrifice his interests for the group’s alleged interests. And both frequently use the biggest group of all—the public—to justify their schemes.

It should not be a surprise then, that “progressives” and conservatives use similar language when they defend their policies. Each defends its version of cronyism by proclaiming that it serves the “public interest” or the “national good.”

Similar Posts

  • Hotel California

    In “Hotel California,” Don Henley tells us that, “You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.” It turns out that these words might be more than clever lyrics for a song. Hundreds of thousands of Californians are checking out and fleeing to states with lower taxes and fewer regulations. But…

  • Using People as Pawns

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott have recently made headlines for sending immigrants to “sanctuary states,” i.e., states that do not cooperate with federal immigration officials. Both claim that they are trying to send a message to Joe Biden. In truth, they are simply playing to their base and using people as…

  • Nullification: The Practical vs. the Moral

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on February 1, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. Last Friday’s post on Glenn Beck drew some defense of his position on the grounds of nullification. I didn’t specifically address nullification in that post, but my comments certainly had implications on the issue. Since the individual defending nullification…

  • An Insensitive A-hole

    Even in normal times, it can be extremely difficult to make certain statements without being considered an insensitive a-hole. In these days of a pandemic, that has become even more true. Those who question the government’s actions are quickly labeled as caring more about money than people. But sometimes such statements need to made if…

  • |

    The Whole Truth

    The headline for a recent article on CNBC.com declares, “The 7 most affordable U.S. states to retire—and none of them are Florida” illustrates the intellectual dishonesty that is prevalent in today’s media. The article states that Michigan is the most affordable state in which to retire according to a study issued by Bankrate. This is…