|

Facts vs. Fear

A recent study conducted in New York State concluded that 13.9 percent, or about 2.7 million, of the state’s residents have been infected with the coronavirus. That number is ten times higher than the state’s official count of 269,000.

While government officials were quick to point out that these are preliminary results, it supports a widely held belief: A large number of people have been infected with the coronavirus and have exhibited only mild, or no, symptoms. And two studies in California–one by the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and one by Stanford in Santa Clara County–as well as studies in Germany and the Netherlands, have come to a similar conclusion.

If these numbers are accurate, the mortality rate of the coronavirus would plummet to about .5 percent. While this is still much higher than the seasonal flu, it would appear that contracting the coronavirus is not the death sentence that many government officials would like us to believe.

For example, in announcing her mandatory face mask order, Harris County Judge Lina Hildago warned violators: “You can and will lead to death.” Similarly, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo responded to those who claimed the cure of an economic shutdown was worse than the illness: “The illness is death. What is worse than death?”

Despite the hyperbole from Hildago, Cuomo, and countless other government officials, being infected with the coronavirus does not mean certain death. In fact, if the studies cited above are accurate, 99.5 percent of the people infected will survive.

If the American people had the actual facts, they would be far less accepting of the economic shutdown. But the facts do not support the desires of power lusting government officials, and so they must resort to fear. They must make the American people believe that anyone contracting the disease will die, and anyone who defies government orders is a mass murder.

But the fact is, no individual can single-handily wreak the death and destruction that government can. No individual can shut down an economy and make it illegal to work–only government can. No individual can prohibit others from trying a drug that might save one’s life–only government can. No individual can prevent others from producing and selling values that others want and need–only government can.

In the past two months, government has made it illegal for many to work, prohibited many from trying potentially life-saving drugs, and prevented individuals from producing and selling the values that others want and need. Government has justified all of this, not with facts, but with fear. If we do not sheepishly obey government’s edicts, we will all die.

The sad fact is, the coronavirus will kill relatively few of us. But the longer we sheepishly follow government’s edicts, the more all of us will suffer.

Similar Posts

  • Creating Values

    One aspect of property rights that is often overlooked is the freedom to create material values. If we are not free to create material values–property–then the right to property does not exist. Human life requires material values. An individual who is not free to create the values that his life requires is denied the means…

  • Tough Times

    Tough times demand tough talkDemand tough heartsDemand tough songs Rush, “Force Ten” Tough times do demand tough talk. They demand an honest discussion of the issue at hand, all of the alternatives, and an explicit awareness of the full context. This is true of us individually and as a society. Tough times do demand tough…

  • Abbott’s Consistency

    Like most of the nation’s governors, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott declared a state of emergency when the pandemic first started. He then promptly shut down much of the state’s economy in an effort to stop the spread of the coronavirus. A year later, Abbott was one of the first governors to remove mask mandates and…

  • Conservative Populism

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on January 29, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. Glenn Beck can be both illuminating and infuriating. As an example of the latter, he recently made a statement on his radio show that the states have a right to institute universal health care, hand out free cars, etc….

  • Promoting a Free Market with Coercion

    For months, conservatives have been increasing their calls to use the antitrust laws against Big Tech. These calls are filled with contradictions, such as the claim that Facebook, Twitter, and other tech companies are endangering free speech by blocking conservative content. Another contradiction is expressed by Will Chamberlain, publisher of Human Events. Chamberlain writes that…