An Insensitive A-hole

Even in normal times, it can be extremely difficult to make certain statements without being considered an insensitive a-hole. In these days of a pandemic, that has become even more true. Those who question the government’s actions are quickly labeled as caring more about money than people.

But sometimes such statements need to made if we wish to have a rational discussion. Sometimes we need people to question the conventional wisdom. And now is one of those sometimes.

The long-term consequences of the economic impact of shutting down production are beyond the capacity of anyone to understand in all of its ramifications. The economy is a staggeringly complex interaction between billions of individuals across the world. While there are certain principles guiding those interactions, nobody can understand and predict all of the consequences of disrupting one industry, let alone disrupting every industry simultaneously.

However, we can predict with certainty that disrupting the entire economy will have dire consequences. We are already seeing that with soaring unemployment. But that is only the tip of the iceberg.

To date, most people have looked to government to deal with this crisis. They have accepted government imposed restrictions on their freedom to work, to create values, to consume values, to live. They have allowed their lives to be disrupted in an unimaginable and unprecedented manner.

All of this, we have been told, is to save lives. And anyone who questuons the government’s actions is an insensitive a-hole. Unfortunately, we have allowed government officials to direct the narrative.

If, as government officials have said, their goal is to save lives, then we should demand that they explain what that means. Their statements imply that they want to prevent people from dying from COVID-19, but their actions are and will cause individuals to lose their jobs, their health insurance, and their hope for a better future. Their means of saving lives are destroying lives.

If saving lives is the goal of those imposing outrageous restrictions on us, then how do they explain the lives that they are destroying? To those imposing the restrictions, asking such a question makes one an intensive a-hole.

Similar Posts

  • Cheers for Ken Potrock

    On Tuesday, Ken Potrock, president of Disneyland Resorts, issued a statement criticizing the California government’s lockdown orders. And he didn’t “play nice” or grovel. We have proven that we can responsibly reopen, with science-based health and safety protocols strictly enforced at our theme park properties around the world. Nevertheless, the State of California continues to…

  • |

    The Great Shopping Cart Theft

    CNN reports that cities across the nation are cracking down on abandoned shopping carts. They are fining retailers and imposing storage fees for carts the municipality collects. Some are also fining individuals who remove carts from store property, but most are putting responsibility for the great shopping cart theft on retailers. City officials argue that…

  • Caught in the Crossfire

    When government expands its powers beyond its legitimate purpose of protecting individual rights, unintended consequences are unleashed. When various levels of government use those powers for different goals, the individual is invariably caught in the crossfire. Government’s response to the pandemic is one example. Early in the pandemic, states and localities across the nation ordered…

  • The Freedom to Choose

    Both “progressives” and conservatives speak about the freedom to choose. Yet, they do so very selectively. They adamantly support an individual’s freedom to choose in regard to some issues, and then are equally adamant in opposing an individual’s freedom to choose in regard to other issues. For example, “progressives” support an individual’s freedom to choose…

  • Context Matters

    Knowledge is not a series of random, isolated ideas. Knowledge is, as Leonard Peikoff puts it, “an organization or integration of interconnected elements, each relevant to the others.” That integration is the context, and context matters. If we fail to consider all of the relevant facts we are guilty of dropping context. Important information does…