Government Schools are a Ponzi Scheme

Texas state Rep. Gene Wu (D-Houston) inadvertently admits that government schools are nothing more than a Ponzi scheme. According to Wikipedia, a Ponzi scheme “is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors.” This is precisely what Wu describes in opposing school choice:

Even a, like, one- or two-percent change in school populations has dramatic, multi-million dollar consequences for these schools. And it’s not just that. It’s also retired teachers. Whenever you have fewer students, you’re going to have fewer teachers. Fewer teachers mean fewer teachers paying into teachers’ retirement which is barely solvent right now.

Teachers are not investors in the traditional sense. Teachers are forced to contribute to the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS), regardless of their own desires or needs. However, current teachers are paying for the benefits given to retired teachers.

According to Wu, more funding for government schools is necessary to retain teachers. And teachers should be retained so that they can continue to “contribute” to the retirement system. Actually educating students is a secondary consideration.

As of August 31, 2022 the TRS had assets amounting to 79 percent of the system’s incurred liabilities. In other words, TRS owes more money than it has. Current estimates project that the system will be fully funded in twenty-three years. To do this, current teachers will be forced to increase their “contributions” beginning in fiscal 2024. However, if the state’s teachers union has its way, that won’t be enough to increase the system’s funding ratio.

The Texas chapter of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) Retiree Plus program

focuses exclusively on educating members and lobbying the state Legislature about the Teacher Retirement System of Texas, protecting your pension and TRS-Care.

The Texas AFT is currently coordinating a campaign in support of a cost of living adjustment for retirees. If successful, this will increase the system’s liabilities. This will likely result in increased “contributions” from current teachers. No matter what happens, the fact remains that without continuing and increasing contributions from current teachers, the system will go broke. And that is a predicament ultimately faced by every Ponzi scheme, including government schools.

Similar Posts

  • “Parents’ Rights” and Wrongs

    When rights are ascribed to groups, conflicts necessarily result when non-members of the favored group become victims of the alleged rights. This is true no matter which group is favored, including parents. An illuminating example comes from Florida, where advocates of “parents’ rights” have achieved many legislative victories, including an expanded school choice program. Instead…

  • Educational Freedom

    In September, the Heritage Foundation released its Education Freedom Report Card. Florida received the top rating for educational freedom, followed by Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, and South Dakota. The District of Columbia was ranked last for educational freedom, with New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and Massachusetts joining D.C. at the bottom of the rankings. Heritage used…

  • A Very Bad Lesson

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on March 5, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. On Thursday, college students across the nation protested funding cuts to state colleges. The students are upset because they are taking on more debt and in some cases, having to choose between eating or buying books. Not surprisingly, the…

  • |

    The Roundup 4

    Close Public Libraries Permanently Nearly a year after Harvey flooded many of Houston’s public libraries, six remain closed and virtually no repairs have been performed at the others. The city is still waiting for insurance money and FEMA checks. Now would be a good time to consider closing down the entire public library system. There…