False Alternatives: Solitude or Independence

A recent poll by Pew Research found that a growing number of young women say that they are unlikely to get married. In an opinion piece on Fox, author J. P. De Gance decries this finding. For decades, he writes, parents have taught their daughters to obtain an education, establish a career, and become financially stable. He acknowledges this as wise advice. However, “when the strongest message is that needing another person is a kind of failure, it becomes harder for some young women to see marriage as anything other than a risk to that hard-earned independence.”

He goes on to argue that nobody is truly independent. For many years, we depend on our parents to care for us. As we grow into adulthood, we rely on others for many things, such as food, clothing, and shelter. And, in old age, we often depend on caretakers. This argument, while perhaps plausible to many, depends on a complete distortion of independence.

To De Gance, independence requires one to satisfy his needs and desires without interacting or cooperating with others. We must grow our own food, build our housing, and sew our clothes. If one accepts De Gance’s view of independence, love and friendship are impossible because they require interaction with others.

De Gance then cashes in on his irrational view of independence by giving us false alternatives. To encourage more women to view marriage in a positive light, they need to be taught that “prioritizing a shared life with self-sacrifice often turns out to be richer and more meaningful than a carefully guarded solitary one chasing shallow consumerism. [emphasis added]”. In other words, women must choose between a life of solitude or a life of self-sacrifice—altruism.

Independence means accepting the responsibility of judging the truth and acting accordingly rather than depending on the judgment of others. An independent person does not shun others, nor does he attempt to produce everything that he wants and needs. He interacts and trades with others when doing so is a value. The pursuit and attainment of values, not self-sacrifice, is what truly makes life richer and more fulfilling.

Other people can be a tremendous value, whether through trade, friendship, or romantic love. And they are a value, not because they offer an opportunity for self-sacrifice but because the values they offer make our life richer.

Similar Posts

  • Vaccine Imperialism

    For months, there have been increasing demands for waivers for the intellectual property rights to COVID vaccines. Big Pharma, the argument goes, should share its knowledge and technology with anyone who desires it. To refuse to do so is “vaccine imperialism.” The failure to waive intellectual property rights is being blamed for the low vaccination…

  • The Nihilism of BLM

    In mid-August, Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesters marched through a Seattle neighborhood demanding that the white property owners give up their homes. The neighborhood, which has undergone gentrification, was once predominantly black. One protester said, Give black people back their homes! You’re sitting there comfortably — comfortable as f—k as if they didn’t help gentrify…

  • An Orwellian View of Freedom

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently announced a proposal for a state law to permanently prohibit vaccine passports, forbid businesses from requiring masks, and prohibit “employers from hiring or firing based mRNA stabs.” In making the announcement, DeSantis said that during the pandemic Florida has served “strongly as freedom’s linchpin.” DeSantis has an Orwellian view of…

  • The Childless Left Isn’t the Problem

    In 2021, Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance blamed America’s problems on the “childless left.” He singled out Vice-President Kamala Harris, transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg, Senator Cory Booker and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as examples. Despite Vance’s claim, the childless left isn’t the problem. Certainly, Harris, Buttigieg, Booker, and AOC are a part of the problem. But…