Get Individual Rights and Government Wrongs for Free

What if there were no government regulations? What if there were no public schools, public libraries, or public parks? What if there were no labor laws, minimum wage laws, or prohibitions on discrimination? How would government function if it did not force you to pay for its services?

If you are like most Americans, you believe that without regulations, public goods, and taxation, society would quickly decay into chaos and anarchy. You believe that businesses would market dangerous and unsafe products, that the poor would be locked into a cycle of ignorance and poverty, that employees would be left to the mercy of employers. And, if financing government were voluntary, you believe that nobody would volunteer. Despite the widespread acceptance of these views, they are false in theory and in practice.

Both history and the contemporary world provide an abundance of evidence that government coercion—in the form of controls, regulations, and edicts—does not accomplish its stated goals. Whether it is mail delivery, education, infrastructure, land-use, or energy, government intervention is impractical. It is impractical because it is immoral; it violates an individual’s moral right to act according to his own judgment in the pursuit of his own values.

Individual Rights and Government Wrongs examines more than a dozen different issues, from mail delivery to education, from energy to land-use, from labor laws to discrimination, and in each instance we find the same thing. In each instance, we find that government intervention kills jobs, raises costs, limits opportunities, and destroys lives. And, in each instance, we also find that freedom—the absence of coercion—leads to progress, new and better products and services, lower costs, and good will towards fellow citizens.

The examples cited span the globe, from America to France, from Great Britain to India. They cover centuries, from colonial America to the contemporary world. They demonstrate that the recognition of individual rights is not a “luxury” for developed nations, or a passing fad, or something that happened to work for a short period of history. Individual rights are universally true and applicable. They are moral and practical, for all men, in all nations, at all times.

Individual Rights and Government Wrongs is now available for FREE. Simply enter your email below and within minutes you can be reading about alternatives the media doesn’t discuss.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Promises are Cheap

    The Biden Administration has announced plans to build or restore 2 million homes to address the housing shortage. This is a very grand plan, and it is receiving praise from many advocates for low-income housing. However, it is more than likely that the number of homes built or restored will fall far short of the…

  • Systemic Racism

    It is difficult to read anything written by a Leftist without seeing the words “systemic racism” used to explain an issue. Systemic racism is blamed when a white police officer kills a black thug resisting arrest. When a black woman is raising her children without the father, the cause is systemic racism. When a black…

  • We Don’t Need Adjectives for Justice

    It has become increasingly popular to add adjectives to “justice.” This has led to “social justice,” “racial justice,” environmental justice,” and now, “housing justice.” As an example, Casey Dawkins, Professor of Urban Studies and Planning at the University of Maryland, claims that we must develop a new understanding of justice as it applies to housing….

  • Conservative Populism

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on January 29, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. Glenn Beck can be both illuminating and infuriating. As an example of the latter, he recently made a statement on his radio show that the states have a right to institute universal health care, hand out free cars, etc….

  • An Exception that Isn’t

    If you examine nearly any debate regarding government policy, almost all of the discussion revolves around government imposing more restrictions and controls on businesses and individuals. It might seem that proposals to eliminate single-family zoning (SFZ) are an exception and a move towards greater respect for individual rights. But that appearance is a mirage. Most…

  • Deja Vu

    In the last Texas legislative session, great controversy erupted over Austin’s attempts to reign in local governments. Bills were introduced to prohibit local controls over plastic bags, trees, short-term rentals, and more. Local governments claimed that these efforts by the state usurped their authority. A similar controversy has erupted in California. California State Senator Scott…