When Capitalists and Socialists Seem to Agree

It is extremely rare for socialists and capitalists to agree on an issue. After all, socialists believe that the state should control the economy while capitalists advocate for a complete separation of state and economics. However, on the issue of publicly funded sports stadiums, socialists and capitalists seem to agree, but that agreement is an illusion.

In November, voters in Albuquerque rejected a $50 million bond proposal for a new sports stadium. The anti-bond effort was promoted by a socialist news site—Liberation. Socialists opposed the bond proposal because it would be “a massive force for gentrification and displacement” and would benefit millionaires. Socialists support welfare for the needy, but not for corporations.

In contrast, capitalists oppose publicly funded sports stadiums because they force individuals to pay for something that they may not value. Capitalists believe that sports stadiums should be built entirely with private funds. Capitalists are opposed to government welfare programs in any form.

Publicly funded means coercively funded. It means forcing individuals and businesses to financially support a project or program regardless of their own choices and desires. In a truly capitalist society, coercively funding anything, including sports stadiums, is forbidden.

Socialists are not opposed to coercion. They support coercive taxation to fund their welfare schemes. They support controls and restrictions on whatever private property is allowed to exist. They just want that coercion to be used for purposes that they approve of.

The why determines the what. Why a position is taken determines what it actually means. In regard to publicly funded stadiums, socialists and capitalists have very different “whys.” They may agree that publicly funded stadiums are inappropriate, but what that means is very different.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Government Without Taxation

    To “celebrate” Tax Day 2018, I am offering a free download of “Government Without Taxation” from my book Individual Rights and Government Wrongs. In this chapter, I examine why it is both moral and practical to finance government through voluntary means. While many believe that government can only be financed through coercive taxation–by forcing individuals…

  • Context Matters

    Knowledge is not a series of random, isolated ideas. Knowledge is, as Leonard Peikoff puts it, “an organization or integration of interconnected elements, each relevant to the others.” That integration is the context, and context matters. If we fail to consider all of the relevant facts we are guilty of dropping context. Important information does…

  • The Bully in Florida

    Once again, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has demonstrated his willingness to use strong-arm tactics against those who make decisions that he doesn’t like. The latest example came in early June when Florida threatened to fine the Special Olympics $27.5 million for violating the state’s prohibition on vaccine mandates. The threat caused the Special Olympics to…

  • The Tyranny of Nullification

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on March 23, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. I have previously written that nullification–a state declaring a particular federal law unconstitutional and thereby inapplicable within that state–would ultimately lead to tyranny. But we do not need to rely solely on theoretic arguments to see the truth of…

  • Virtual Mayoral Candidacy

    In February 2009, I announced my “virtual” candidacy for Mayor of Houston. It was a campaign conducted solely through my blog, Live Oaks, and was intended to demonstrate the positions that a freedom-loving candidate would take. Below is my platform. Over the past few months I have previewed some of the potential candidates for the…