The Democrats vs. Santa

I will admit that I quit believing in Santa Claus many years ago. But the Democrat candidates apparently still believe. However, they have added a twist to the story of Santa that I was told as a child.

When I still believed in Santa, I was told that he kept a list. Boys and girls who were good throughout the year would have some of their wishes fulfilled. Those who had been naughty would receive a lump of coal. In other words, what we received from Santa would be a consequence of our actions. In that regard, Santa was about justice–giving to individuals what they have earned.

But the Democrats have dispensed with the concept of justice. They believe that individuals have earned an increasing list of values–housing, a “living wage,” education, and health care to name a few. And individuals have earned these values because they exist. To the Democrats, individuals don’t earn values by their actions, but merely by being born.

The values that Democrats want to hand out like cheap candy must be created. Developers and builders, businessmen and entrepreneurs, teachers and professors, doctors and nurses–these are the people who create the values that Democrats want to hand out for free. But values cannot be dispensed for free–somebody must pay for them. And when values are given for free by politicians, it is the producers of those values who pay.

Politicians do not create values, and thus they have no values to hand out for free. But politicians can seize values from the producers and give them to those who have not produced. That is not justice. That is a gross injustice.

Democrats believe that individuals deserve certain values, regardless or in spite of their own actions. If an individual takes no action to get an education, improve his job skills, plan for his future, the Democrats do not hold him responsible for the dire straits he later finds himself in. Instead, the Democrats want to reward him with free tuition, an unearned raise, and affordable housing. They want to shackle those who do in order to get the votes of those who won’t do.

Similar Posts

  • Conservative Populism

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on January 29, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. Glenn Beck can be both illuminating and infuriating. As an example of the latter, he recently made a statement on his radio show that the states have a right to institute universal health care, hand out free cars, etc….

  • |

    The Choices We Make

    In any discussion regarding public policy, we must consider the full context. In regard to affordable housing, the full context includes the choices that individuals make. Housing advocates conveniently ignore this issue. They point to poor families paying a large percentage of their income for housing, but fail to address the choices that have led…

  • When Tiger was Truly Selfish

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on March 1, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. During his public apology for marital infidelity, Tiger Woods blamed his actions on “selfishness”. I thought of nobody but myself, he declared. As I pointed out last week, his actions were anything but selfish. Interestingly, Tiger has been truly…

  • That Which is Seen

    In 1850, the French economist, Claude Frédéric Bastiat, wrote an essay titled “That Which is Seen and That Which is not Seen.” The essay is timeless, and it is particularly enlightening at a time when government spending has reached new levels of profligacy. The introduction to the essay lays out its central point: In the…