Eliminating Freedom of Choice

ByBrian Phillips

Most people want the freedom to choose how they will live their lives. Yet, many of those same people advocate policies that eliminates freedom of choice for others. They support freedom of choice, so long as they agree with the choices. Sadly, we see this among both Republicans and Democrats.

Republicans don’t like the choices social media companies make regarding content. And so, they want to dictate how companies like Facebook, Twitter, and You Tube operate. Democrats don’t like the choices that energy companies and consumers make. And so, they seek to force us to abandon fossil fuels.

The result is a tug-of-war in which each side attempts to force others to do its bidding. It is gang warfare being conducted under the guise of democracy. The “will of the people,” we are regularly told, reigns supreme. The will of the individual—each individual—is irrelevant.

Those who want freedom of choice find themselves caught in the crossfire between these competing gangs. Sadly, many conclude that joining a gang is the best form of protection. But this only makes the problem worse. The solution to gang warfare won’t be found by making the gangs larger. The solution is to end gang warfare. The solution is to protect the freedom of each individual to live as he chooses, so long as he respects the freedom of others to do the same.

We will not always like or agree with the choices that others make. The test of our commitment to freedom of choice is found during such occasions. If we truly support freedom of choice, then we must defend the freedom of every individual. To do otherwise is to claim that our gang should be free to choose, but others should not enjoy the same freedom.

Rational individuals recognize and defend the freedom of others to express ideas with which we disagree. We must extend that same respect to the choices made by others.

Similar Posts

  • The Lust for Power

    ByBrian Phillips

    Nearly everyone lusts for power. In and of itself, the lust for power is morally neutral. The type of power that one seeks determines whether it is good or bad, moral or evil. When we think of examples of power lusters, dictators, gang leaders, and bullies often come to mind. Such individuals seek power over…

  • Woman of Color

    ByBrian Phillips

    This is a guest post by JP Miller In late January we witnessed a brazen low point in the history of the United States. President Joseph Biden announced the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer from the Supreme Court. He would be examining candidates with the best minds, the highest moral character and best records of…

  • The Primacy of Production

    ByBrian Phillips

    The values that human life requires are not simply laying around for us to pick up. They must be produced. Food must be grown, harvested, processed, and shipped to our grocer. Shelter must be built, and that requires countless industries and tradesmen. We can’t survive without consuming values, and we can’t consume values that haven’t…

  • “Stooges” for Wall Street

    ByBrian Phillips

    Writing for the Socialist Alternative, Varun Belor laments the failure of Seattle’s City Council to pass a rent control ordinance. Belor notes that none of the council’s eight Democrats supported the bill, and for more than forty years the Democrat dominated state legislature has upheld Washington’s ban on rent control. Democrats, Belor claims are “stooges”…