Hemp Law Creates Problems and Opportunities

When Gov. Greg Abbott signed a bill legalizing the growing of hemp in Texas, he created problems for law enforcement agencies. Federal law defines hemp as having less than .3 percent THC (the active ingredient in marijuana). While the tests currently used by law enforcement in Texas can detect the presence of THC, those tests cannot determine the amount of THC.

As a result, law enforcement officials have stopped prosecuting some marijuana cases because they have insufficient evidence under the new law. An advisory released by the Texas District and County Attorneys Association in June stated:

The distinction between marijuana and hemp requires proof of the THC concentration of a specific product or contraband, and for now, that evidence can come only from a laboratory capable of determining that type of potency — a category which apparently excludes most, if not all, of the crime labs in Texas right now.

While the new law is creating problems for police and prosecutors, it is also creating an opportunity for those who believe that individuals should be free to ingest the products of their own choosing, whether it be experimental cancer drugs, raw milk, or marijuana.

A bill that would decriminalize marijuana passed the Texas House earlier this year, but Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick prevented the bill from being considered by the Senate.

It will likely cost laboratories millions of dollars to upgrade equipment to meet the requirements of the new law. With the majority of Texans supporting decriminalization of marijuana, spending that money in order to prosecute someone with a few joints is absurd. But the fundamental argument for legalizing marijuana is moral.

Each individual has a moral right to consume the products of his choosing. It is his life, and he has a moral right to live it as he chooses, for better or worse.

In principle, if the government can prohibit us from consuming certain products, then there is virtually no aspect of our life that is beyond government control.

Certainly, some products are destructive by their very nature. But government cannot force individuals to be rational and make wise choices. It can only create the social conditions necessary for individuals to be rational. And that means protecting the freedom of each individual to act as he judges best, so long as he respects the freedom of others to do the same.

Legalizing marijuana is not the most important issue facing Texas. But it would be a step in the direction of more freedom, and that is always the proper direction to move.

Similar Posts

  • Wanna Bet?

    The recent Supreme Court ruling striking down a federal law that prohibited most states from allowing betting on sporting events was a double-edged sword. While it struck down a right-violating law, it will do nothing to prevent states from violating individual rights. According to CNN, The court said the federal law violated constitutional principles limiting…

  • An Insensitive A-hole

    Even in normal times, it can be extremely difficult to make certain statements without being considered an insensitive a-hole. In these days of a pandemic, that has become even more true. Those who question the government’s actions are quickly labeled as caring more about money than people. But sometimes such statements need to made if…

  • |

    The Choices We Make

    In any discussion regarding public policy, we must consider the full context. In regard to affordable housing, the full context includes the choices that individuals make. Housing advocates conveniently ignore this issue. They point to poor families paying a large percentage of their income for housing, but fail to address the choices that have led…

  • Altruism’s ”Rebels”

    As more employers are requiring employees to get vaccinated for COVID-19 or submit to regular testing, employees are fighting back with lawsuits. Among the most frequent reasons given is: “It’s my right to not get vaccinated.” On the surface, these individuals may seem to be altruism’s “rebels.” It is true that individuals have a right…

  • The Childless Left Isn’t the Problem

    In 2021, Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance blamed America’s problems on the “childless left.” He singled out Vice-President Kamala Harris, transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg, Senator Cory Booker and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as examples. Despite Vance’s claim, the childless left isn’t the problem. Certainly, Harris, Buttigieg, Booker, and AOC are a part of the problem. But…