Preventing the Californiazation of Texas, Part 4

In the previous three posts, we have examined the fear many Texans have of the Californiazation of their state. While there is some legitimacy to this concern, it doesn’t address the fundamental issue.

California is being destroyed because most Californians believe it proper and just to impose the values of the majority upon individuals. As we have seen in previous posts, Texans embrace this same idea. That they implement it differently is simply a matter of detail.

If Texans want to prevent the Californiazation of their state, then they must reject the idea of majority rule. And in its place they must support and defend individual rights, including property rights.

While many, if not most, Texans proclaim to support property rights, few do so consistently. Most accept the idea that property use should be restricted when it will benefit the neighborhood, the community, or “the public.” They accept the idea that property rights are not inalienable but are something that can be abridged when the cause is right—right as determined by the majority.

But Californians could make the same claim. They could claim that they support property rights, but controls and restrictions on property use are appropriate when it will protect the ocean, the poor, rivers, spotted owls, or anything else the neighborhood, the community, or “the public” deems worthy of protection. The details of implementation might vary, but the principle doesn’t.

Rights protect the freedom of individuals to live as they choose, so long as they respect the freedom of others to do the same. When the majority can impose its values upon individuals, any freedom enjoyed by individuals is not a right, but merely a permission granted by the majority. And that permission can be revoked whenever the majority deems it proper.

Texas is on the road to repeat California’s destructive mistakes. But it’s not because of an influx of Californians or other immigrants. It is because of the ideas that most Texans have accepted. Until those ideas are rejected by Texans, the Lone Star State will creep closer and closer to the abyss of high taxes, stifling regulations on business, and outrageous housing costs that is destroying California.

Similar Posts

  • Cronyism is Fascism

    In a capitalist society, government is limited to defending the rights of individuals—the freedom of individuals to act without coercive interference from others. But that is not what occurs when cronyism is practiced. Cronyism is the practice of dispensing political favors to some at the expense of others. With altruism and collectivism serving as the…

  • |

    A Collision on the Left

    A political controversy between housing advocates and construction labor unions has been brewing in California. These two groups generally agree on many political principles, and their disagreement over a proposed bill might confuse some. But the fact is, the very nature of those political principles makes such disagreements inevitable. Both housing advocates and labor unions…

  • The Nihilism of BLM

    In mid-August, Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesters marched through a Seattle neighborhood demanding that the white property owners give up their homes. The neighborhood, which has undergone gentrification, was once predominantly black. One protester said, Give black people back their homes! You’re sitting there comfortably — comfortable as f—k as if they didn’t help gentrify…

  • An American Inquisition

    Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr recently wrote, “Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions — also known as the fake news — have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up. The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if…