The Arbitrary as Propaganda

In 2020, a United States District judge dismissed a slander suit filed against Fox talking head, Tucker Carlson. In her ruling, the judge said,

The ‘general tenor’ of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not ‘stating actual facts’ about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in ‘exaggeration’ and ‘non-literal commentary.’

Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer ‘arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism’ about the statement he makes.

According to the judge and Fox lawyers, what Carlson says should not be regarded as true. But that doesn’t mean what he says is false. Many of Carlson’s statements are neither true nor false. They are arbitrary.

The arbitrary, wrote Ayn Rand,

means a claim put forth in the absence of evidence of any sort, perceptual or conceptual; its basis is neither direct observation nor any kind of theoretical argument. [An arbitrary idea is] a sheer assertion with no attempt to validate it or connect it to reality.

An arbitrary claim is worse than false—it has no cognitive value. One can’t evaluate an arbitrary claim; one can only dismiss it without consideration.

Carlson is certainly not the only propagandist to use arbitrary statements. However, Carlson’s program is regularly the most watched on cable, meaning that millions are being exposed to his arbitrary claims. And while “reasonable viewers” may not regard his claims as true, “unreasonable viewers” are likely to accept his pronouncements.

For many of those “unreasonable viewers,” Carlson is feeding into their anger and frustration. Whether his claims are true or not is irrelevant. What he says appeals to them on an emotional level, and that is all they care about.

Those who accept Carlson’s arbitrary claims are capable of almost anything. If truth and facts do not matter, then the only guide to action is emotion. And when anger is the dominant emotion, we get things like the attack on the United States Capitol last January 6, which Carlson has defended.

It is a sad state of affairs when cable’s most popular “news” personality admittedly tosses out arbitrary claims like beads at Mardi Gras. Drunken revelers at Mardi Gras have a grand time for short period, but the next morning many awake wondering what they had done to themselves. Someday, Carlson’s followers will suffer that same type of hangover. Unfortunately, they may very well inflict the same pain on the entire nation.

Similar Posts

  • Tough Times

    Tough times demand tough talkDemand tough heartsDemand tough songs Rush, “Force Ten” Tough times do demand tough talk. They demand an honest discussion of the issue at hand, all of the alternatives, and an explicit awareness of the full context. This is true of us individually and as a society. Tough times do demand tough…

  • Freedom for the Fishermen

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on October 2, 2009. Comments have not been migrated. Earlier this week Chronicle columnist Lisa Falkenberg provided us with a look into the state’s food stamp program. Texas isn’t coming close to meeting federal requirements to process food stamp applications within a month. Last month, about 38,000 new…

  • Wanna Bet?

    The recent Supreme Court ruling striking down a federal law that prohibited most states from allowing betting on sporting events was a double-edged sword. While it struck down a right-violating law, it will do nothing to prevent states from violating individual rights. According to CNN, The court said the federal law violated constitutional principles limiting…

  • The Lust for Power

    Nearly everyone lusts for power. In and of itself, the lust for power is morally neutral. The type of power that one seeks determines whether it is good or bad, moral or evil. When we think of examples of power lusters, dictators, gang leaders, and bullies often come to mind. Such individuals seek power over…