On Writing: Historical Fiction

Writing historical fiction presents both challenges and opportunities. The challenges lie in choosing the degree of historical accuracy to include. The opportunities lie in the ability to present events and characters in a more idealistic manner, that is, what could have been and should have been.

As an example, the Shattering Paradigms series takes place from the years just before the Civil War until several years after Reconstruction. This was a period of great social and political turmoil throughout the South as Blacks and whites dealt with the end of slavery. Historically, the story did not end well for Blacks, as violence and Jim Crow laws relegated them to second-class status. The actual history of that era provided me with an intriguing background for the series.

As I studied the history of the post-Civil War years, many questions occurred to me. What would have happened if one brave person had challenged the paradigms of Southern culture? How would Blacks have responded if they had social and political equality with whites? What would have happened in the South if economic freedom for both Blacks and whites had been recognized and protected? Shattering Paradigms is my answer to these, and similar, questions.

History provided me with the conflict that drives the series. History also provided me with many courageous men and women who fought for the rights of Blacks, and I use actual quotes from many of them. Introducing fictional elements enabled me to depict events and characters that would have changed the course of history.

Readers have asked me how much of the series is historically accurate and how much is fiction. That is a difficult, and perhaps impossible, question to answer. Certainly, I can point to events and characters that are historically accurate. However, even when a particular event actually occurred, I often added fictional elements to create drama, advance the plot, or something similar. I think the most satisfying answer I can give is that the essence of the conflict is historically accurate, while many of the details are fictional.

Similar Posts

  • On Writing: I Can be God

    Years ago, a friend asked me why I enjoyed writing fiction. Somewhat facetiously, I said that writing fiction wasn’t as restricted by reality as nonfiction. That statement was truer than I realized. The artist recreates reality in his vision of what is important and significant. It is in this sense that when I write fiction,…

  • On Writing: Psycho-epistemology

    One of the most important, and overlooked, aspects of writing is the relationship between the conscious mind and the subconscious mind. Ayn Rand called this psycho-epistemology, which she defined as “the study of man’s cognitive processes from the aspect of the interaction between the conscious mind and the automatic functions of the subconscious.” Psycho-epistemology does…

  • On Writing: Brainstorming

    In a previous post, I briefly addressed psycho-epistemology—the interaction between the conscious mind and the subconscious mind in the writing process. When we brainstorm, we must rely on the subconscious mind. The purpose of writing is to communicate. Effective writing makes it easy for the reader to comprehend the main point being communicated. This requires…

  • |

    Overcoming the Squirms

    Writing is seldom the glamorous activity that many perceive it to be. At times, it can be absolute torture. And this can be particularly true when we experience what Ayn Rand called “the squirms.” (This is better known as writer’s block.) The squirms occur when we become paralyzed in our writing. No matter how clear…