The Value of Writing a Crappy Novel

My first attempt at writing a novel was a disaster. My “thriller” wasn’t very thrilling. In fact, The Wolverine was a crappy novel, but I found value in the process of writing it.

Prior to writing The Wolverine, my fiction writing was limited to short stories. Unsurprisingly, writing a novel is considerably more challenging than writing short stories. There are more characters and more events. The plot is more complex, and often there are subplots. There are more details that the author must organize and keep in mind when writing. When I began, I wasn’t certain that I was up to the challenge of writing a novel-length story.

Completing The Wolverine showed me I could write a novel. Along the way, I learned how to organize a story and keep the details in mind. In short, I developed a process for writing novels. And that was the primary value of writing a crappy novel.

I considered re-writing the novel to make it more thrilling. However, I concluded it would require more time than I wanted to invest. Although the novel wasn’t worthy of publication, it served as valuable practice.

Like any skill, writing requires practice. However, writing novels requires a different skill set than writing short stories and nonfiction. To develop those skills, one must practice. The Wolverine was my first practice, and is often the case, my initial attempt was less than ideal.

I’ve previously written that we should accept the fact our first draft won’t be perfect. We must first get the ideas on paper, and then we can improve the draft. That was essentially my attitude while writing The Wolverine. Someday I may rewrite the novel. But in the meantime, I recognize the value of writing a crappy novel.

Similar Posts

  • |

    A Writing Lesson

    I wrote my first book in about fifteen months. I have been working on my second book for nearly two years, and the process has been both frustrating and illuminating. The frustrating part has been the slow progress. While I have done a tremendous amount of research, I also did a lot of research for…

  • On Writing: I Can be God

    Years ago, a friend asked me why I enjoyed writing fiction. Somewhat facetiously, I said that writing fiction wasn’t as restricted by reality as nonfiction. That statement was truer than I realized. The artist recreates reality in his vision of what is important and significant. It is in this sense that when I write fiction,…

  • |

    Overcoming the Squirms

    Writing is seldom the glamorous activity that many perceive it to be. At times, it can be absolute torture. And this can be particularly true when we experience what Ayn Rand called “the squirms.” (This is better known as writer’s block.) The squirms occur when we become paralyzed in our writing. No matter how clear…

  • Writers Write

    Over the years, I have heard countless people express a desire to write a book. While that is certainly a laudable ambition, I am unaware of anyone who has actually written a book. I think a primary reason for this is they don’t understand a simple truth: writers write. And I speak from personal experience….

  • On Writing: Psycho-epistemology

    One of the most important, and overlooked, aspects of writing is the relationship between the conscious mind and the subconscious mind. Ayn Rand called this psycho-epistemology, which she defined as “the study of man’s cognitive processes from the aspect of the interaction between the conscious mind and the automatic functions of the subconscious.” Psycho-epistemology does…

  • |

    God is in the Details

    Presenting philosophical ideas to a general audience is a huge challenge. This is particularly true when the ideas that we are presenting challenge the audience’s views and beliefs. One of the most effective ways to do this is to concretize—to present examples that the audience can understand and relate to. It is easy to make…