Another Open Letter to the Montclair Property Owners Association

In an open letter to the Montclair Property Owners Association (MPOA) in February, I wrote:

MPOA isn’t opposed to rent control as a matter of moral principle. The association just doesn’t like the particular version passed by the town council. This approach will fail in the long-term because it cedes the moral principle involved—the right to property.

The rent control ordinance is still being fought in court. However, a rent freeze has been in place since March 2020, and last week the township council extended the freeze until the end of the year.

MPOA argued against the extension, saying “that the rate of inflation and the growing costs of property maintenance were putting landlords at a disadvantage.” This is true, but again, in arguing on practical grounds, MPOA cedes the moral principle involved. As I previously wrote, “Arguing against rent control on the basis of its impracticality is itself impractical.” The same applies to rent freezes, and the ineffectiveness of MPOA’s opposition to the freeze serves as evidence.

Arguments founded on the practicality of a policy are doomed to failure. What is practical is determined by what one wants to practice. Rent control and freezes seek to protect tenants from rent increases, and in this regard, they are very practical. So, when one argues on practical grounds, the issue becomes: practical to whom?  Inevitably, some will benefit at the expense of others, and council members will determine the winners and the losers.

One council member noted that some property owners were not opposed to the rent freeze extension. However, property owners are not monolithic. Some may believe that voluntarily freezing rents is in their best interest. Some may believe that raising rents is in their best interest. These are decisions that property owners should be free to make. Indeed, each individual—including tenants—has a moral right to choose the course of action that he believes will be beneficial to him.

The rent freeze makes the property owner’s choices irrelevant. With the rent freeze, a property owner cannot act as he judges best. He must act as council members dictate. When landlords accept the legitimacy of council controlling and restricting their businesses, then the only issue up for debate is the extent and the type of controls and restrictions. This framework must be rejected.

MPOA members must proudly assert their moral right to operate their business as they deem best. Now is not the time to be timid.

Similar Posts

  • Yelp is Causing Gentrification

    A professor in San Diego has concluded that Yelp reviews of ethnic restaurants are contributing to gentrification and displacement. The reviews “contribute to the transformation of urban foodscapes — the physical, symbolic, cultural, lived, and imagined food environments — that have been built by people of color….” And because the reviewers are “primarily young, white,…

  • Friday Roundup 9-10-21

    In April, Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unveiled the Green New Deal for Public Housing Act. The bill would “invest” $172 billion over 10 years to upgrade over 950,000 public housing units. When the bill was announced, Sanders said, “It is unacceptable that our nation’s public housing is in a state of chronic disrepair and…

  • |

    A Collision on the Left

    A political controversy between housing advocates and construction labor unions has been brewing in California. These two groups generally agree on many political principles, and their disagreement over a proposed bill might confuse some. But the fact is, the very nature of those political principles makes such disagreements inevitable. Both housing advocates and labor unions…

  • Bake More Pies

    For more than one hundred years, government officials have decried the difficulty many Americans face when they attempt to buy a home. Indeed, housing affordability has become a rallying cry for both progressives and conservatives. Their solutions invariably involve one scheme or another for how to distribute the existing housing stock. Those solutions will fail,…

  • Freedom of Choice

    Housing advocates are promoting two bills before the Texas legislature (HB1470 and SB265) in the name of freedom of choice. But these bills are not about freedom of choice. The two bills would make it illegal for landlords to refuse to accept housing choice vouchers or other forms of financial aid for housing. This, we…

  • Expanding Tenants’ “Rights”

    Progressives in Washington State are applauding recently passed laws giving tenants expanded “rights.” The laws include greater restrictions on the ability of landlords to evict tenants, the right to counsel during evictions, and a requirement that landlords offer a “reasonable” payment plan for tenants who are behind on their rent. Despite the rhetoric of Progressives,…