|

The Roundup 12

An opinion piece in The Dallas Morning News correctly notes that SB12, which would force social media platforms like Facebook to publish content the company finds objectionable.

Can you imagine a law that forced someone who plants a yard sign supporting a Republican candidate to also place one for the Democratic opponent beside it? That’s what we’re talking about. The law would force a private entity to share ideas that go against its beliefs.

I certainly don’t agree with many of the policies at Facebook, Twitter, and other big tech companies. But it is safe to say that the leaders of those companies don’t agree with many of my ideas. If I want the freedom to express the ideas of my choosing, and refrain from supporting ideas that I disagree with, then I must support their freedom to determine which ideas they will allow on their platforms. SB12 infringes on that freedom.

$ $ $

A new ordinance in Chicago requires developers to pay the city $15,000 for each single-family home that is demolished and $5,000 per unit for larger housing buildings. The law is intended to slow gentrification. An Alderman who flipped four houses in the targeted area for a profit of $300,000 in 2015 and supported the ordinance said,

This is a moral issue. I think the fees should be much higher … the purpose behind all of this, we hope, is to stop gentrification, stop development and stop displacing us.

The hypocritical Alderman is correct. This is a moral issue. In addition to the blatant violation of property rights, it is an issue of integrity. The Alderman had no qualms profiting from the area’s gentrification, but now he wants to impose steep fines on others who follow in his path.

$ $ $

The City Council in Austin has passed a resolution supporting “tenants rights.” The resolution provides funding for rent relief, as well as money for repairs and utility bills for renters. One of the sponsors of the resolution said,

Housing is a human right. In passing this resolution, we are telling tenants that their rights matter just as much as everyone else who calls Austin home.

What about the rights of the taxpayers who will be forced to pay for this boondoggle? Whether they support the resolution or not, taxpayers–including many who are themselves struggling financially–will be forced to pay rent and utilities for others.

Similar Posts

  • Claims without Evidence

    Progressives Regresssives are renowned for making claims and not providing evidence. Propogandist Patrick Range McDonald provides an example in an article titled “Corporate landlords’ misinformation campaign to stop rent control.” Including the headline, on eight occasions McDonald claims that opponents of rent control are engaged in lies, disinformation, or misinformation. Despite the repetitive claims, he…

  • Friday Roundup 12-17-21

    New York City is considering a law that would prohibit landlords from considering most criminal convictions while screening prospective tenants. One ex-convict told a reporter, “Just think of the worst thing you’ve ever done, and suppose someone held that against you for the rest of your life.” Context matters. There is a huge difference between…

  • Those Who don’t Learn from History…

    Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck once asserted, “In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing.” Economists disagree on many things, but almost universally agree that rent control is a bad idea. But this hasn’t stopped politicians and housing advocates from calling for more rent…

  • | |

    The “Right to Return”

    Austin has become the latest city to implement a “right to return” policy. Though such policies vary, they give households an opportunity to return to a neighborhood after being displaced by gentrification. Austin will sell twenty-eight homes owned by the city to low-income households. Each property will be operated as a community land trust (CLT)….

  • Friday Roundup 1-21-22

    Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden Administration did not have legislative authority to issue a mandate that employers with more than 100 workers require vaccination. The Court did not say that vaccine mandates are unconstitutional or a violation of individual rights. It simply said that Congress hasn’t authorized such a rights-violating mandate….

  • Friday Roundup 2-4-22

    A Scottish man was recently convicted for sending a tweet that was deemed offensive. The tweet was disgusting, saying that the only good British soldier is a dead one. Freedom of speech protects our right to make offensive and disgusting statements. Rather than prosecute those who are intentionally offensive, we should recognize such statements for…