Hotel California

In “Hotel California,” Don Henley tells us that, “You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.” It turns out that these words might be more than clever lyrics for a song. Hundreds of thousands of Californians are checking out and fleeing to states with lower taxes and fewer regulations. But they may soon discover that they didn’t really leave the regulations behind.

I recently wrote about a California law that prohibits the sale of pork in the state unless the animals from which it was derived were housed under specific space requirements. Because the state represents about 13 percent of pork sales, pig farmers in Iowa and elsewhere will spend an estimated $350 million to comply with the regulation. Consumers across the nation will pay higher prices for pork products, whether they checked out of California or not. But this is not the only example of the impact of California’s regulatory regime.

A growing number of states are adopting regulations established by the California Air Resource Board. Among other things, those regulations dictate emission standards that must be met by new vehicles. And beginning in 2024, vehicles that weigh more than 14,000 pounds and built before 2010 are prohibited from operating on the state’s roads. Whether other states adopt these standards or not, prices for automobiles and trucks will increase across the nation.

In addition, if the cost of heavy-duty trucks goes up, then so does the cost of transporting food, computers, construction materials, and virtually every other consumer product. California’s regulations will force all of us to pay higher prices for nearly everything we buy.

California is plagued with homelessness, an outrageous cost of living, growing crime in large cities, and an anti-business regulatory regime. Despite these ills, other states are increasingly following California’s lead. The results won’t be any different than they are in California.

Many Americans have never checked into Hotel California but will soon find that they are paying the price.

Similar Posts

  • The Internet versus the Internet

    We are often told that private companies won’t invest money into certain technologies, such as “green” energy, because it isn’t economically feasible. Government, the argument goes, must “invest” money for the research that will allow these technologies to become profitable. And as evidence, the advocates of subsidies to “green” energy companies point to the Internet….

  • The “Living” Constitution

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on March 22, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. A few weeks ago a commenter argued that the Constitution is a “living” document. According to Wikipedia: The Living Constitution is a concept in American constitutional interpretation which claims that the Constitution has a dynamic meaning. The idea is…

  • |

    Freedom over Fascism

    When the United States House of Representatives debated the “Parents Bill of Rights Act,” Democrats made a series of strange claims. One of the more curious statements came from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), who declared that she values “freedom over fascism.” It has become fashionable among Leftists to call conservatives fascist. While this is often an…

  • More Sticks and Fewer Carrots

    Last week, I wrote about the government’s use of carrots and sticks to manipulate the behavior of home buyers. Now, in response to Trump’s new health care plan, a physician is calling for more sticks and fewer carrots regarding health care insurance. Trump has proposed sending money directly to Americans rather than to insurance companies….

  • The Crony Ideology

    Both leftists and conservatives embrace the crony ideology. That they apply that ideology differently is merely a matter of detail. So, what is the crony ideology? The essence of the crony ideology is the belief that government force should be used to compel or prohibit certain actions. Every act of cronyism ultimately rests on this…