PLF Suing Biden over Student Loans

On September 27, 2022, the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) announced that it is suing the Biden administration in an effort to halt the President’s cancellation of student loan debt.

The plaintiff in the lawsuit is Frank Garrison, a public interest lawyer in Indiana. He has been making payments on his student loans for six years. He will automatically have $20,000 of his debt cancelled. According to PLF,

He did not ask for cancellation, doesn’t want it, and has no way to opt out of it.

The state of Indiana will tax the cancelled debt, which will leave him worse off financially. PLF states that hundreds of thousands of public interest workers face a similar situation.

Public interest workers aren’t the only individuals who will experience financial costs that were not voluntarily chosen. Taxpayers—the individuals who will pay for this boondoggle—will also be worse off. And they too will have no way to opt out.

The Department of Education, the defendant in the case, called the lawsuit “baseless” and said that

opponents of the debt relief plan are trying anything they can to stop this program that will provide needed relief to working families.

Of course, the administration conveniently ignores the additional financial burden the program will place on working families through higher taxes, inflation, or both.

Steve Simpson, an attorney at PLF, said,

Loan cancellation will make Americans more divided, as those who paid their loans—or never went to college—will have good reason to think that we no longer have a government of, by, and for the people.

With the mid-term election fast approaching, this is nothing more than an undisguised attempt to buy votes from the forty million borrowers who may qualify for the program. If it is successful, we can expect more of the same in the future.

Similar Posts

  • Democracy and Libraries

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on July 12, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. In an effort to balance their budgets, cities across the nation are reducing the money they spend on public libraries. Not surprisingly, the Chronicle finds this “alarming”: For Americans of limited means, and that includes many Houstonians, public libraries…

  • The War on the Republic

    Regressives (they call themselves “Progressives”) have long opposed the system of limited government established by the drafters of the Constitution. As one example, the Seventeenth Amendment, which established direct elections of United States Senators, was ratified in 1913 at the height of the first “Progressive” movement. Prior to that time, Senators were selected by each…

  • Our Brother’s Keeper

    One of the arguments against illegal immigration is that the “illegals” rape and pillage our social welfare system. “Illegals” take advantage of Social Security, government schools, hospitals, and countless other services provided by taxpayers. The critics seldom object to providing these services to American citizens. They believe that we are our brother’s keeper, and they…

  • Tiger Woods Scores a Bogey

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on February 22, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. I have followed the career of Tiger Woods since he was in high school. I regarded him as a refreshing example of talent and character. Revelations of his marital “transgressions” was more than a surprise–it felt like a good…

  • Racism, Cartels, and Jim Crow

    This was originally posted on Live Oaks on December 26, 2010. Comments have not been migrated. It is often claimed that capitalism leads to all sorts of ills, such as racism and cartels (or monopolies). As with most attacks on capitalism, these claims attempt to blame capitalism for the consequences of government intervention into the…