The Crony Ideology

Both “progressives” and conservatives embrace the crony ideology. That they apply that ideology differently is merely a matter of detail. So, what is the crony ideology?

The essence of the crony ideology is the belief that government force should be used to compel or prohibit certain actions. Every act of cronyism ultimately rests on this belief, and this is true whether the cronyism is practiced by leftists or by conservatives.

Underlying this belief in the use of government force is a more fundamental idea—collectivism. Collectivism holds that the individual is and should be subordinate to the group, such as the tribe, the community, or the nation. According to collectivism, the individual must subordinate his own welfare and interests to those of the group. The group, rather than the individual, is the standard of value.

Altruism is the morality used to justify subservience of the individual to the group. The essence of morality, according to altruism, is self-sacrificial service to others. Collectivism defines who the “others” are—it defines which group will be sacrificed and group will benefit.

“Progressives”and conservatives do not disagree over altruism. Both embrace it. They disagree over which particular group or groups should serve as the standard of value. But they heartily agree that the individual has a moral obligation to sacrifice his interests for the group’s alleged interests. And both frequently use the biggest group of all—the public—to justify their schemes.

It should not be a surprise then, that “progressives” and conservatives use similar language when they defend their policies. Each defends its version of cronyism by proclaiming that it serves the “public interest” or the “national good.”

Similar Posts

  • Divide and Conquer

    Environmentalists like to talk about thinking globally but act locally. The point is to think about the big picture but act within one’s community to make a difference, and this has been an effective strategy. The flip side of this coin is to think locally and act without principles. This strategy focuses on the moment…

  • Profits are Pro-people

    When pharmaceutical companies refused to waive their intellectual property rights to the COVID-19 vaccines, they were attacked for putting profits before people. When landlords increase rents to a level that tenants cannot afford, the property owns are condemned for putting profits before people. These attacks, and others like them, are unjust. Profits are pro-people. The…

  • Context Matters

    Knowledge is not a series of random, isolated ideas. Knowledge is, as Leonard Peikoff puts it, “an organization or integration of interconnected elements, each relevant to the others.” That integration is the context, and context matters. If we fail to consider all of the relevant facts we are guilty of dropping context. Important information does…

  • “Stooges” for Wall Street

    Writing for the Socialist Alternative, Varun Belor laments the failure of Seattle’s City Council to pass a rent control ordinance. Belor notes that none of the council’s eight Democrats supported the bill, and for more than forty years the Democrat dominated state legislature has upheld Washington’s ban on rent control. Democrats, Belor claims are “stooges”…

  • Freedom of Speech Must be Inviolate

    Israeli businessman Shlomo Kramer recently called upon governments to take control of all social media platforms. Such a measure is needed, he claimed, to stop “polarization” and prevent the spread of lies. “We need to stack,” he explained, “rank the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online and take control over what they are saying,…

  • Using People as Pawns

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott have recently made headlines for sending immigrants to “sanctuary states,” i.e., states that do not cooperate with federal immigration officials. Both claim that they are trying to send a message to Joe Biden. In truth, they are simply playing to their base and using people as…